Regulating Group Exposure for Item Providers in Recommendation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Engaging all content providers, including newcomers or minority demographic groups, is crucial for online platforms to keep growing and working. Hence, while building recommendation services, the interests of those providers should be valued. In this paper, we consider providers as grouped based on a common characteristic in settings in which certain provider groups have low representation of items in the catalog and, thus, in the user interactions. Then, we envision a scenario wherein platform owners seek to control the degree of exposure to such groups in the recommendation process. To support this scenario, we rely on disparate exposure measures that characterize the gap between the share of recommendations given to groups and the target level of exposure pursued by the platform owners. We then propose a re-ranking procedure that ensures desired levels of exposure are met. Experiments show that, while supporting certain groups of providers by rendering them with the target exposure, beyond-accuracy objectives experience significant gains with negligible impact in recommendation utility.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.
- 2023(Un)fair Exposure in Deep Face Rankings at a Distancecited by 1
- 2023(Un)fair Exposure in Deep Face Rankings at a Distance22 Aug 2023