mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Tweets2Stance: Users stance detection exploiting Zero-Shot Learning Algorithms on Tweets

arXiv 2204.10710 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2022cs.SI cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the last years there has been a growing attention towards predicting the political orientation of active social media users, being this of great help to study political forecasts, opinion dynamics modeling and users polarization. Existing approaches, mainly targeting Twitter users, rely on content-based analysis or are based on a mixture of content, network and communication analysis. The recent research perspective exploits the fact that a user's political affinity mainly depends on his/her positions on major political and social issues, thus shifting the focus on detecting the stance of users through user-generated content shared on social networks. The work herein described focuses on a completely unsupervised stance detection framework that predicts the user's stance about specific social-political statements by exploiting content-based analysis of its Twitter timeline. The ground-truth user's stance may come from Voting Advice Applications, online tools that help citizens to identify their political leanings by comparing their political preferences with party political stances. Starting from the knowledge of the agreement level of six parties on 20 different statements, the objective of the study is to predict the stance of a Party p in regard to each statement s exploiting what the Twitter Party account wrote on Twitter. To this end we propose Tweets2Stance (T2S), a novel and totally unsupervised stance detector framework which relies on the zero-shot learning technique to quickly and accurately operate on non-labeled data. Interestingly, T2S can be applied to any social media user for any context of interest, not limited to the political one. Results obtained from multiple experiments show that, although the general maximum F1 value is 0.4, T2S can correctly predict the stance with a general minimum MAE of 1.13, which is a great achievement considering the task complexity.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2022.

Builds on

24 of 68 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  5. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  6. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  7. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  8. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,818
  9. 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,090
  10. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,035
  11. 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 915
  12. 2019Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generationcited by 670
12 more
  1. 2020Pre-trained Models for Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 505
  2. 2019Benchmarking Zero-shot Text Classification: Datasets, Evaluation and Entailment Approachcited by 308
  3. 2019BERTje: A Dutch BERT Modelcited by 109
  4. 2020Stance Detection on Social Media: State of the Art and Trendscited by 95
  5. 2016Stance Detection with Bidirectional Conditional Encodingcited by 93
  6. 2019Unsupervised User Stance Detection on Twittercited by 45
  7. 2020PTT5: Pretraining and validating the T5 model on Brazilian Portuguese datacited by 35
  8. 2020Stance Detection in Web and Social Media: A Comparative Studycited by 25
  9. 2019Your Stance is Exposed! Analysing Possible Factors for Stance Detection on Social Mediacited by 18
  10. 2020Embeddings-Based Clustering for Target Specific Stances: The Case of a Polarized Turkeycited by 12
  11. 2022Fine-Grained Prediction of Political Leaning on Social Media with Unsupervised Deep Learningcited by 8
  12. 2019Rumor Detection and Classification for Twitter Datacited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.