BugListener: Identifying and Synthesizing Bug Reports from Collaborative Live Chats
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In community-based software development, developers frequently rely on live-chatting to discuss emergent bugs/errors they encounter in daily development tasks. However, it remains a challenging task to accurately record such knowledge due to the noisy nature of interleaved dialogs in live chat data. In this paper, we first formulate the task of identifying and synthesizing bug reports from community live chats, and propose a novel approach, named BugListener, to address the challenges. Specifically, BugListener automates three sub-tasks: 1) Disentangle the dialogs from massive chat logs by using a Feed-Forward neural network; 2) Identify the bug-report dialogs from separated dialogs by modeling the original dialog to the graph-structured dialog and leveraging the graph neural network to learn the contextual information; 3) Synthesize the bug reports by utilizing the TextCNN model and Transfer Learning network to classify the sentences into three groups: observed behaviors (OB), expected behaviors (EB), and steps to reproduce the bug (SR). BugListener is evaluated on six open source projects. The results show that: for bug report identification, BugListener achieves the average F1 of 74.21%, improving the best baseline by 10.37%; and for bug report synthesis task, BugListener could classify the OB, EB, and SR sentences with the F1 of 67.37%, 87.14%, and 65.03%, improving the best baselines by 7.21%, 7.38%, 5.30%, respectively. A human evaluation also confirms the effectiveness of BugListener in generating relevant and accurate bug reports. These demonstrate the significant potential of applying BugListener in community-based software development, for promoting bug discovery and quality improvement.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Generative AI and Empirical Software Engineering: A Paradigm Shiftcited by 9
- 2025Past, Present, and Future of Bug Tracking in the Generative AI Eracited by 4
- 2026Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learningcited by 0
- 2026How Do LLMs Read Bug Reports? An Empirical Study of Attention in LLMs for Automated Program Repaircited by 0
- 2026How Do LLMs Read Bug Reports? An Empirical Study of Attention in LLMs for Automated Program Repair28 Jul 2026
- 2026Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learning20 Apr 2026
- 2025Past, Present, and Future of Bug Tracking in the Generative AI Era9 Oct 2025
- 2025Generative AI and Empirical Software Engineering: A Paradigm Shift12 Feb 2025