mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

A crowdsourcing approach to video quality assessment

arXiv 2204.06784 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2022eess.IVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The gold standard for measuring video quality is the subjective test, and the most prevalent is the ITU-T Rec. P.910, a lab-based subjective standard in use for the past two decades. However, in practice using ITU-T Rec. P.910 is slow, expensive, and requires a lab, which all create barriers to usage. As a result, most research papers that need to measure video quality don't use ITU-T Rec. P.910 but rather metrics that are not well correlated to subjective opinion. We provide an open-source extension of ITU-T Rec. P.910 based on crowdsourcing principles which address the speed, usage cost, and barrier to usage issues. We implement Absolute Category Rating (ACR), ACR with hidden reference (ACR-HR), Degradation Category Rating (DCR), and Comparison Category Rating (CCR). It includes rater, environment, hardware, and network qualifications, as well as gold and trapping questions to ensure quality. We have validated that the implementation is both accurate and highly reproducible compared to existing ITU-T Rec. P.910 lab studies.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

8 papers.