Variable importance measures for heterogeneous treatment effects
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Motivated by applications in precision medicine and treatment effect heterogeneity, recent research has focused on estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) using machine learning (ML). CATE estimates may represent complicated functions that provide little insight into the key drivers of heterogeneity. Therefore, we introduce nonparametric treatment effect variable importance measures (TE-VIMs), based on the mean-squared error (MSE) in predicting the individual treatment effect. More precisely, TE-VIMs represent the increase in MSE when variables are removed from the CATE conditioning set. We derive efficient TE-VIM estimators which can be used with any CATE estimation strategy and are amenable to ML estimation. We propose several strategies to calculate these VIMs (e.g. leave-one out, or keep-one in), using popular meta-learners for the CATE. We study the finite sample performance through a simulation study and illustrate their application using clinical trial data.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2023Variable importance for causal forests: breaking down the heterogeneity of treatment effectscited by 6
- 2024A hierarchical decomposition for explaining ML performance discrepanciescited by 5
- 2024Measuring Variable Importance in Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Confidencecited by 3
- 2023Transparency challenges in policy evaluation with causal machine learning -- improving usability and accountabilitycited by 2
- 2024Automatic debiasing of neural networks via moment-constrained learningcited by 2
- 2025Overview and practical recommendations on using Shapley Values for identifying predictive biomarkers via CATE modelingcited by 1
- 2025"Who experiences large model decay and why?" A Hierarchical Framework for Diagnosing Heterogeneous Performance Driftcited by 1
- 2024Counterfactual explainability and analysis of variancecited by 0
- 2026From Tokens to Policy: Causal and Interpretable Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Identificationcited by 0
- 2026Bridging extrinsic and intrinsic variable importancecited by 0
- 2026Bridging extrinsic and intrinsic variable importance31 Jul 2026
- 2026From Tokens to Policy: Causal and Interpretable Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Identification15 Jun 2026
- 2025"Who experiences large model decay and why?" A Hierarchical Framework for Diagnosing Heterogeneous Performance Drift31 May 2025
- 2025Overview and practical recommendations on using Shapley Values for identifying predictive biomarkers via CATE modeling2 May 2025
- 2024Counterfactual explainability and analysis of variance3 Nov 2024
- 2024Automatic debiasing of neural networks via moment-constrained learning29 Sep 2024
- 2024Measuring Variable Importance in Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Confidence23 Aug 2024
- 2024A hierarchical decomposition for explaining ML performance discrepancies22 Feb 2024
- 2023Transparency challenges in policy evaluation with causal machine learning -- improving usability and accountability20 Oct 2023
- 2023Variable importance for causal forests: breaking down the heterogeneity of treatment effects7 Aug 2023