mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Do Not Fire the Linguist: Grammatical Profiles Help Language Models Detect Semantic Change

arXiv 2204.05717 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2022cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Morphological and syntactic changes in word usage (as captured, e.g., by grammatical profiles) have been shown to be good predictors of a word's meaning change. In this work, we explore whether large pre-trained contextualised language models, a common tool for lexical semantic change detection, are sensitive to such morphosyntactic changes. To this end, we first compare the performance of grammatical profiles against that of a multilingual neural language model (XLM-R) on 10 datasets, covering 7 languages, and then combine the two approaches in ensembles to assess their complementarity. Our results show that ensembling grammatical profiles with XLM-R improves semantic change detection performance for most datasets and languages. This indicates that language models do not fully cover the fine-grained morphological and syntactic signals that are explicitly represented in grammatical profiles. An interesting exception are the test sets where the time spans under analysis are much longer than the time gap between them (for example, century-long spans with a one-year gap between them). Morphosyntactic change is slow so grammatical profiles do not detect in such cases. In contrast, language models, thanks to their access to lexical information, are able to detect fast topical changes.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2022.

Builds on

19 of 38 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  2. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
  3. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
  4. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 253
  5. 2021Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 230
  6. 2016Diachronic Word Embeddings Reveal Statistical Laws of Semantic Changecited by 221
  7. 2020SemEval-2020 Task 1: Unsupervised Lexical Semantic Change Detectioncited by 108
  8. 2020Analysing Lexical Semantic Change with Contextualised Word Representationscited by 92
  9. 2018The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing Meaning through Word Embeddingscited by 87
  10. 2019Leveraging Contextual Embeddings for Detecting Diachronic Semantic Shiftcited by 37
  11. 2018Diachronic Usage Relatedness (DURel): A Framework for the Annotation of Lexical Semantic Changecited by 35
  12. 2020UiO-UvA at SemEval-2020 Task 1: Contextualised Embeddings for Lexical Semantic Change Detectioncited by 32
7 more
  1. 2019A Wind of Change: Detecting and Evaluating Lexical Semantic Change across Times and Domainscited by 31
  2. 2018Short-Term Meaning Shift: A Distributional Explorationcited by 23
  3. 2020Capturing Evolution in Word Usage: Just Add More Clusters?cited by 22
  4. 2016De-Conflated Semantic Representationscited by 12
  5. 2021Grammatical Profiling for Semantic Change Detectioncited by 10
  6. 2016The Social Dynamics of Language Change in Online Networkscited by 9
  7. 2022NorDiaChange: Diachronic Semantic Change Dataset for Norwegiancited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.