mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Analysis of Discretization Methods for Communication Learning with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2204.05669 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.MAcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Communication is crucial in multi-agent reinforcement learning when agents are not able to observe the full state of the environment. The most common approach to allow learned communication between agents is the use of a differentiable communication channel that allows gradients to flow between agents as a form of feedback. However, this is challenging when we want to use discrete messages to reduce the message size since gradients cannot flow through a discrete communication channel. Previous work proposed methods to deal with this problem. However, these methods are tested in different communication learning architectures and environments, making it hard to compare them. In this paper, we compare several state-of-the-art discretization methods as well as two methods that have not been used for communication learning before. We do this comparison in the context of communication learning using gradients from other agents and perform tests on several environments. Our results show that none of the methods is best in all environments. The best choice in discretization method greatly depends on the environment. However, the discretize regularize unit (DRU), straight through DRU and the straight through gumbel softmax show the most consistent results across all the tested environments. Therefore, these methods prove to be the best choice for general use while the straight through estimator and the gumbel softmax may provide better results in specific environments but fail completely in others.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2022.

Builds on

11 of 21 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
  2. 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,031
  3. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  4. 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,135
  5. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
  6. 2016Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagationcited by 355
  7. 2017Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populationscited by 257
  8. 2019Understanding Straight-Through Estimator in Training Activation Quantized Neural Netscited by 225
  9. 2019On the Pitfalls of Measuring Emergent Communicationcited by 66
  10. 2021Learning to Ground Multi-Agent Communication with Autoencoderscited by 37
  11. 2020Learning to Communicate Using Counterfactual Reasoningcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

6 papers.