Evaluation of Automatic Text Summarization using Synthetic Facts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite some recent advances, automatic text summarization remains unreliable, elusive, and of limited practical use in applications. Two main problems with current summarization methods are well known: evaluation and factual consistency. To address these issues, we propose a new automatic reference-less text summarization evaluation system that can measure the quality of any text summarization model with a set of generated facts based on factual consistency, comprehensiveness, and compression rate. As far as we know, our evaluation system is the first system that measures the overarching quality of the text summarization models based on factuality, information coverage, and compression rate.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2022.
Builds on
15 of 26 references.
References · 15
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
- 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,100
- 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 578
- 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 376
- 2020FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 292
- 2020Detecting Hallucinated Content in Conditional Neural Sequence Generationcited by 151
- 2020Evaluating Factuality in Generation with Dependency-level Entailmentcited by 122
- 2019Assessing The Factual Accuracy of Generated Textcited by 103
- 2019Answers Unite! Unsupervised Metrics for Reinforced Summarization Modelscited by 92
- 2020Towards Question-Answering as an Automatic Metric for Evaluating the Content Quality of a Summarycited by 87
- 2018Content Selection in Deep Learning Models of Summarizationcited by 64
3 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.