Rockafellian Relaxation and Stochastic Optimization under Perturbations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In practice, optimization models are often prone to unavoidable inaccuracies due to dubious assumptions and corrupted data. Traditionally, this placed special emphasis on risk-based and robust formulations, and their focus on ``conservative" decisions. We develop, in contrast, an ``optimistic" framework based on Rockafellian relaxations in which optimization is conducted not only over the original decision space but also jointly with a choice of model perturbation. The framework enables us to address challenging problems with ambiguous probability distributions from the areas of two-stage stochastic optimization without relatively complete recourse, probability functions lacking continuity properties, expectation constraints, and outlier analysis. We are also able to circumvent the fundamental difficulty in stochastic optimization that convergence of distributions fails to guarantee convergence of expectations. The framework centers on the novel concepts of exact and limit-exact Rockafellians, with interpretations of ``negative'' regularization emerging in certain settings. We illustrate the role of Phi-divergence, examine rates of convergence under changing distributions, and explore extensions to first-order optimality conditions. The main development is free of assumptions about convexity, smoothness, and even continuity of objective functions. Numerical results in the setting of computer vision and text analytics with label noise illustrate the framework.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2022.
Builds on
18 of 74 references.
References · 18
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
- 2015Data-driven Distributionally Robust Optimization Using the Wasserstein Metric: Performance Guarantees and Tractable Reformulationscited by 285
- 2016Statistics of Robust Optimization: A Generalized Empirical Likelihood Approachcited by 182
- 2013Data-Driven Robust Optimizationcited by 84
- 2017Let's Make Block Coordinate Descent Converge Faster: Faster Greedy Rules, Message-Passing, Active-Set Complexity, and Superlinear Convergencecited by 16
- 2019Diametrical Risk Minimization: Theory and Computationscited by 15
- 2019Optimistic Distributionally Robust Optimization for Nonparametric Likelihood Approximationcited by 12
- 2020Optimistic Distributionally Robust Policy Optimizationcited by 5
6 more
- 2013Fabrication-Adaptive Optimization, with an Application to Photonic Crystal Designcited by 2
- 2017Optimistic Robust Optimization With Applications To Machine Learningcited by 2
- 2019On sample average approximation for two-stage stochastic programs without relatively complete recoursecited by 2
- 2021Good and Bad Optimization Models: Insights from Rockafellianscited by 2
- 2021A data-driven approach to beating SAA out-of-samplecited by 2
- 2019Trimmed Constrained Mixed Effects Models: Formulations and Algorithmscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.