mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adaptive-Gravity: A Defense Against Adversarial Samples

arXiv 2204.03694 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a novel model training solution, denoted as Adaptive-Gravity, for enhancing the robustness of deep neural network classifiers against adversarial examples. We conceptualize the model parameters/features associated with each class as a mass characterized by its centroid location and the spread (standard deviation of the distance) of features around the centroid. We use the centroid associated with each cluster to derive an anti-gravity force that pushes the centroids of different classes away from one another during network training. Then we customized an objective function that aims to concentrate each class's features toward their corresponding new centroid, which has been obtained by anti-gravity force. This methodology results in a larger separation between different masses and reduces the spread of features around each centroid. As a result, the samples are pushed away from the space that adversarial examples could be mapped to, effectively increasing the degree of perturbation needed for making an adversarial example. We have implemented this training solution as an iterative method consisting of four steps at each iteration: 1) centroid extraction, 2) anti-gravity force calculation, 3) centroid relocation, and 4) gravity training. Gravity's efficiency is evaluated by measuring the corresponding fooling rates against various attack models, including FGSM, MIM, BIM, and PGD using LeNet and ResNet110 networks, benchmarked against MNIST and CIFAR10 classification problems. Test results show that Gravity not only functions as a powerful instrument to robustify a model against state-of-the-art adversarial attacks but also effectively improves the model training accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2022.

Builds on

17 of 25 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  5. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  6. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  7. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
  8. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
  9. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
  10. 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 269
  11. 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
  12. 2019Improving Adversarial Robustness via Promoting Ensemble Diversitycited by 213
5 more
  1. 2019Adversarial Defense by Restricting the Hidden Space of Deep Neural Networkscited by 56
  2. 2018Detection based Defense against Adversarial Examples from the Steganalysis Point of Viewcited by 32
  3. 2018Interpreting Adversarial Robustness: A View from Decision Surface in Input Spacecited by 10
  4. 2019Self-Supervised Representation Learning via Neighborhood-Relational Encodingcited by 10
  5. 2020Code-Bridged Classifier (CBC): A Low or Negative Overhead Defense for Making a CNN Classifier Robust Against Adversarial Attackscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.