Deep surrogate accelerated delayed-acceptance HMC for Bayesian inference of spatio-temporal heat fluxes in rotating disc systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce a deep learning accelerated methodology to solve PDE-based Bayesian inverse problems with guaranteed accuracy. This is motivated by the ill-posed problem of inferring a spatio-temporal heat-flux parameter known as the Biot number given temperature data, however the methodology is generalisable to other settings. To accelerate Bayesian inference, we develop a novel training scheme that uses data to adaptively train a neural-network surrogate simulating the parametric forward model. By simultaneously identifying an approximate posterior distribution over the Biot number, and weighting a physics-informed training loss according to this, our approach approximates forward and inverse solution together without any need for external solves. Using a random Chebyshev series, we outline how to approximate a Gaussian process prior, and using the surrogate we apply Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) to sample from the posterior distribution. We derive convergence of the surrogate posterior to the true posterior distribution in the Hellinger metric as our adaptive loss approaches zero. Additionally, we describe how this surrogate-accelerated HMC approach can be combined with traditional PDE solvers in a delayed-acceptance scheme to a-priori control the posterior accuracy. This overcomes a major limitation of deep learning-based surrogate approaches, which do not achieve guaranteed accuracy a-priori due to their non-convex training. Biot number calculations are involved in turbo-machinery design, which is safety critical and highly regulated, therefore it is important that our results have such mathematical guarantees. Our approach achieves fast mixing in high dimensions whilst retaining the convergence guarantees of a traditional PDE solver, and without the burden of evaluating this solver for proposals that are likely to be rejected. Numerical results are given using real and simulated data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2022.
Builds on
7 of 33 references.
References · 7
- 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 674
- 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 329
- 2019Physics-Constrained Deep Learning for High-dimensional Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantification without Labeled Datacited by 261
- 2017A Conceptual Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 207
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Neural Networks and Parametric PDEscited by 74
- 2013Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for Hierarchical Modelscited by 50
- 2019A deep surrogate approach to efficient Bayesian inversion in PDE and integral equation modelscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.