mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Pragmatic constraints and pronoun reference disambiguation: the possible and the impossible

arXiv 2204.01166 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2022cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pronoun disambiguation in understanding text and discourse often requires the application of both general pragmatic knowledge and context-specific information. In AI and linguistics research, this has mostly been studied in cases where the referent is explicitly stated in the preceding text nearby. However, pronouns in natural text often refer to entities, collections, or events that are only implicitly mentioned previously; in those cases the need to use pragmatic knowledge to disambiguate becomes much more acute and the characterization of the knowledge becomes much more difficult. Extended literary texts at times employ both extremely complex patterns of reference and extremely rich and subtle forms of knowledge. Indeed, it is occasionally possible to have a pronoun that is far separated from its referent in a text. In the opposite direction, pronoun use is affected by considerations of focus of attention and by formal constraints such as a preference for parallel syntactic structures; these can be so strong that no pragmatic knowledge suffices to overrule them.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2022.

Builds on

4 of 8 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at Scalecited by 194
  2. 2020Word meaning in minds and machinescited by 51
  3. 2022The Defeat of the Winograd Schema Challengecited by 25
  4. 2013The Relevance of Proofs of the Rationality of Probability Theory to Automated Reasoning and Cognitive Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.