Production of Categorical Data Verifying Differential Privacy: Conception and Applications to Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Private and public organizations regularly collect and analyze digitalized data about their associates, volunteers, clients, etc. However, because most personal data are sensitive, there is a key challenge in designing privacy-preserving systems. To tackle privacy concerns, research communities have proposed different methods to preserve privacy, with Differential privacy (DP) standing out as a formal definition that allows quantifying the privacy-utility trade-off. Besides, with the local DP (LDP) model, users can sanitize their data locally before transmitting it to the server. The objective of this thesis is thus two-fold: O1) To improve the utility and privacy in multiple frequency estimates under LDP guarantees, which is fundamental to statistical learning. And O2) To assess the privacy-utility trade-off of machine learning (ML) models trained over differentially private data. For O1, we first tackled the problem from two "multiple" perspectives, i.e., multiple attributes and multiple collections throughout time, while focusing on utility. Secondly, we focused our attention on the multiple attributes aspect only, in which we proposed a solution focusing on privacy while preserving utility. In both cases, we demonstrate through analytical and experimental validations the advantages of our proposed solutions over state-of-the-art LDP protocols. For O2, we empirically evaluated ML-based solutions designed to solve real-world problems while ensuring DP guarantees. Indeed, we mainly used the input data perturbation setting from the privacy-preserving ML literature. This is the situation in which the whole dataset is sanitized independently and, thus, we implemented LDP algorithms from the perspective of the centralized data owner. In all cases, we concluded that differentially private ML models achieve nearly the same utility metrics as non-private ones.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 247 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2022.
Builds on
10 of 247 references.
References · 10
- 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 400
- 2021Hyperparameter Tuning with Renyi Differential Privacycited by 104
- 2021Natural Language Understanding with Privacy-Preserving BERTcited by 55
- 2020Local Differential Privacy and Its Applications: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 41
- 2020Encode, Shuffle, Analyze Privacy Revisited: Formalizations and Empirical Evaluationcited by 39
- 2016Collecting and Analyzing Data from Smart Device Users with Local Differential Privacycited by 25
- 2020Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports: Anonymization Process Description (version 1.1)cited by 13
- 2020Input Perturbation: A New Paradigm between Central and Local Differential Privacycited by 6
- 2021Improving the utility of locally differentially private protocols for longitudinal and multidimensional frequency estimatescited by 5
- 2020Privacy Enhancement via Dummy Points in the Shuffle Modelcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.