mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving the Factual Accuracy of Abstractive Clinical Text Summarization using Multi-Objective Optimization

arXiv 2204.00797 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2022cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While there has been recent progress in abstractive summarization as applied to different domains including news articles, scientific articles, and blog posts, the application of these techniques to clinical text summarization has been limited. This is primarily due to the lack of large-scale training data and the messy/unstructured nature of clinical notes as opposed to other domains where massive training data come in structured or semi-structured form. Further, one of the least explored and critical components of clinical text summarization is factual accuracy of clinical summaries. This is specifically crucial in the healthcare domain, cardiology in particular, where an accurate summary generation that preserves the facts in the source notes is critical to the well-being of a patient. In this study, we propose a framework for improving the factual accuracy of abstractive summarization of clinical text using knowledge-guided multi-objective optimization. We propose to jointly optimize three cost functions in our proposed architecture during training: generative loss, entity loss and knowledge loss and evaluate the proposed architecture on 1) clinical notes of patients with heart failure (HF), which we collect for this study; and 2) two benchmark datasets, Indiana University Chest X-ray collection (IU X-Ray), and MIMIC-CXR, that are publicly available. We experiment with three transformer encoder-decoder architectures and demonstrate that optimizing different loss functions leads to improved performance in terms of entity-level factual accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2022.

Builds on

20 of 28 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  4. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
  5. 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,100
  6. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
  7. 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
  8. 2019MIMIC-CXR-JPG, a large publicly available database of labeled chest radiographscited by 590
  9. 2018A Discourse-Aware Attention Model for Abstractive Summarization of Long Documentscited by 477
  10. 2015A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarizationcited by 394
  11. 2020ProphetNet: Predicting Future N-gram for Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-trainingcited by 221
  12. 2020TLDR: Extreme Summarization of Scientific Documentscited by 136
8 more
  1. 2019Assessing The Factual Accuracy of Generated Textcited by 103
  2. 2019Optimizing the Factual Correctness of a Summary: A Study of Summarizing Radiology Reportscited by 96
  3. 2019ScisummNet: A Large Annotated Corpus and Content-Impact Models for Scientific Paper Summarization with Citation Networkscited by 73
  4. 2018Learning to Summarize Radiology Findingscited by 54
  5. 2019Ontology-Aware Clinical Abstractive Summarizationcited by 33
  6. 2020Attend to Medical Ontologies: Content Selection for Clinical Abstractive Summarizationcited by 26
  7. 2021RetrievalSum: A Retrieval Enhanced Framework for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 19
  8. 2020Clinical Text Summarization with Syntax-Based Negation and Semantic Concept Identificationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.