mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Self-adjusting Population Sizes for the (1, λ)-EA on Monotone Functions

arXiv 2204.00531 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2022cs.NE math.PRcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the (1,λ)-EA with mutation rate c/n for c≤ 1, where the population size is adaptively controlled with the (1:s+1)-success rule. Recently, Hevia Fajardo and Sudholt have shown that this setup with c=1 is efficient on onemax for s<1, but inefficient if s ≥ 18. Surprisingly, the hardest part is not close to the optimum, but rather at linear distance. We show that this behavior is not specific to onemax. If s is small, then the algorithm is efficient on all monotone functions, and if s is large, then it needs superpolynomial time on all monotone functions. In the former case, for c<1 we show a O(n) upper bound for the number of generations and O(nlog n) for the number of function evaluations, and for c=1 we show O(nlog n) generations and O(n2loglog n) evaluations. We also show formally that optimization is always fast, regardless of s, if the algorithm starts in proximity of the optimum. All results also hold in a dynamic environment where the fitness function changes in each generation.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.