mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Analyzing Wrap-Up Effects through an Information-Theoretic Lens

arXiv 2203.17213 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2022cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Numerous analyses of reading time (RT) data have been implemented -- all in an effort to better understand the cognitive processes driving reading comprehension. However, data measured on words at the end of a sentence -- or even at the end of a clause -- is often omitted due to the confounding factors introduced by so-called "wrap-up effects," which manifests as a skewed distribution of RTs for these words. Consequently, the understanding of the cognitive processes that might be involved in these wrap-up effects is limited. In this work, we attempt to learn more about these processes by examining the relationship between wrap-up effects and information-theoretic quantities, such as word and context surprisals. We find that the distribution of information in prior contexts is often predictive of sentence- and clause-final RTs (while not of sentence-medial RTs). This lends support to several prior hypotheses about the processes involved in wrap-up effects.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2022.

Builds on

5 of 37 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
  3. 2020On the Predictive Power of Neural Language Models for Human Real-Time Comprehension Behaviorcited by 115
  4. 2021Revisiting the Uniform Information Density Hypothesiscited by 63
  5. 2017The Natural Stories Corpuscited by 40

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

10 papers.