Analyzing Wrap-Up Effects through an Information-Theoretic Lens
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Numerous analyses of reading time (RT) data have been implemented -- all in an effort to better understand the cognitive processes driving reading comprehension. However, data measured on words at the end of a sentence -- or even at the end of a clause -- is often omitted due to the confounding factors introduced by so-called "wrap-up effects," which manifests as a skewed distribution of RTs for these words. Consequently, the understanding of the cognitive processes that might be involved in these wrap-up effects is limited. In this work, we attempt to learn more about these processes by examining the relationship between wrap-up effects and information-theoretic quantities, such as word and context surprisals. We find that the distribution of information in prior contexts is often predictive of sentence- and clause-final RTs (while not of sentence-medial RTs). This lends support to several prior hypotheses about the processes involved in wrap-up effects.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2022.
Builds on
5 of 37 references.
References · 5
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
- 2020On the Predictive Power of Neural Language Models for Human Real-Time Comprehension Behaviorcited by 115
- 2021Revisiting the Uniform Information Density Hypothesiscited by 63
- 2017The Natural Stories Corpuscited by 40
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
10 papers.
- 2025Large Language Models Are Human-Like Internallycited by 28
- 2022MedJEx: A Medical Jargon Extraction Model with Wiki's Hyperlink Span and Contextualized Masked Language Model Scorecited by 20
- 2022On the Effect of Anticipation on Reading Timescited by 18
- 2024On the Proper Treatment of Tokenization in Psycholinguisticscited by 12
- 2023Psychometric Predictive Power of Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2023Measuring Information in Text Explanationscited by 1
- 2026Revisiting Real-Time Digging-In Effects: No Evidence from NP/Z Garden-Pathscited by 0
- 2026Probing for Reading Timescited by 0
- 2026Surprisal Theory is Tautological (without Rational Grounding)cited by 0
- 2026Distinct dynamics of conceptual and referential disruptions in human reading and large language model processingcited by 0
- 2026Distinct dynamics of conceptual and referential disruptions in human reading and large language model processing26 Aug 2026
- 2026Surprisal Theory is Tautological (without Rational Grounding)23 Jul 2026
- 2026Probing for Reading Times20 Apr 2026
- 2026Revisiting Real-Time Digging-In Effects: No Evidence from NP/Z Garden-Paths24 Mar 2026
- 2025Large Language Models Are Human-Like Internally3 Feb 2025
- 2024On the Proper Treatment of Tokenization in Psycholinguistics3 Oct 2024
- 2023Psychometric Predictive Power of Large Language Models13 Nov 2023
- 2023Measuring Information in Text Explanations6 Oct 2023
- 2022On the Effect of Anticipation on Reading Times25 Nov 2022
- 2022MedJEx: A Medical Jargon Extraction Model with Wiki's Hyperlink Span and Contextualized Masked Language Model Score12 Oct 2022