mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Remember to correct the bias when using deep learning for regression!

arXiv 2203.16470 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When training deep learning models for least-squares regression, we cannot expect that the training error residuals of the final model, selected after a fixed training time or based on performance on a hold-out data set, sum to zero. This can introduce a systematic error that accumulates if we are interested in the total aggregated performance over many data points. We suggest to adjust the bias of the machine learning model after training as a default postprocessing step, which efficiently solves the problem. The severeness of the error accumulation and the effectiveness of the bias correction is demonstrated in exemplary experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2022.

Builds on

8 of 31 references.

References · 8

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  5. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
  6. 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 943
  7. 2019Distribution Calibration for Regressioncited by 89
  8. 2021Deep Learning Based 3D Point Cloud Regression for Estimating Forest Biomasscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.