mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A deep learning model for burn depth classification using ultrasound imaging

arXiv 2203.15879 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2022eess.IV cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Identification of burn depth with sufficient accuracy is a challenging problem. This paper presents a deep convolutional neural network to classify burn depth based on altered tissue morphology of burned skin manifested as texture patterns in the ultrasound images. The network first learns a low-dimensional manifold of the unburned skin images using an encoder-decoder architecture that reconstructs it from ultrasound images of burned skin. The encoder is then re-trained to classify burn depths. The encoder-decoder network is trained using a dataset comprised of B-mode ultrasound images of unburned and burned ex vivo porcine skin samples. The classifier is developed using B-mode images of burned in situ skin samples obtained from freshly euthanized postmortem pigs. The performance metrics obtained from 20-fold cross-validation show that the model can identify deep-partial thickness burns, which is the most difficult to diagnose clinically, with 99% accuracy, 98% sensitivity, and 100% specificity. The diagnostic accuracy of the classifier is further illustrated by the high area under the curve values of 0.99 and 0.95, respectively, for the receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves. A post hoc explanation indicates that the classifier activates the discriminative textural features in the B-mode images for burn classification. The proposed model has the potential for clinical utility in assisting the clinical assessment of burn depths using a widely available clinical imaging device.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2022.

Builds on

9 of 36 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  7. 2020How Much Can We Really Trust You? Towards Simple, Interpretable Trust Quantification Metrics for Deep Neural Networkscited by 19
  8. 2019DAPAS : Denoising Autoencoder to Prevent Adversarial attack in Semantic Segmentationcited by 14
  9. 2018Combatting Adversarial Attacks through Denoising and Dimensionality Reduction: A Cascaded Autoencoder Approachcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.