mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Powerful Physical Adversarial Examples Against Practical Face Recognition Systems

arXiv 2203.15498 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2022cs.CR cs.AI cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is well-known that the most existing machine learning (ML)-based safety-critical applications are vulnerable to carefully crafted input instances called adversarial examples (AXs). An adversary can conveniently attack these target systems from digital as well as physical worlds. This paper aims to the generation of robust physical AXs against face recognition systems. We present a novel smoothness loss function and a patch-noise combo attack for realizing powerful physical AXs. The smoothness loss interjects the concept of delayed constraints during the attack generation process, thereby causing better handling of optimization complexity and smoother AXs for the physical domain. The patch-noise combo attack combines patch noise and imperceptibly small noises from different distributions to generate powerful registration-based physical AXs. An extensive experimental analysis found that our smoothness loss results in robust and more transferable digital and physical AXs than the conventional techniques. Notably, our smoothness loss results in a 1.17 and 1.97 times better mean attack success rate (ASR) in physical white-box and black-box attacks, respectively. Our patch-noise combo attack furthers the performance gains and results in 2.39 and 4.74 times higher mean ASR than conventional technique in physical world white-box and black-box attacks, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2022.

Builds on

20 of 32 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  5. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  6. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  7. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  8. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  9. 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 911
  10. 2016Joint Face Detection and Alignment using Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Networkscited by 895
  11. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  12. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
8 more
  1. 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 733
  2. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  3. 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 591
  4. 2014Understanding Deep Image Representations by Inverting Themcited by 399
  5. 2016LOTS about Attacking Deep Featurescited by 14
  6. 2021On Brightness Agnostic Adversarial Examples Against Face Recognition Systemscited by 9
  7. 2021Machine Learning Based Cyber Attacks Targeting on Controlled Information: A Surveycited by 5
  8. 2020Security and Privacy Considerations for Machine Learning Models Deployed in the Government and Public Sector (white paper)cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.