Impacts of Personal Characteristics on User Trust in Conversational Recommender Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conversational recommender systems (CRSs) imitate human advisors to assist users in finding items through conversations and have recently gained increasing attention in domains such as media and e-commerce. Like in human communication, building trust in human-agent communication is essential given its significant influence on user behavior. However, inspiring user trust in CRSs with a "one-size-fits-all" design is difficult, as individual users may have their own expectations for conversational interactions (e.g., who, user or system, takes the initiative), which are potentially related to their personal characteristics. In this study, we investigated the impacts of three personal characteristics, namely personality traits, trust propensity, and domain knowledge, on user trust in two types of text-based CRSs, i.e., user-initiative and mixed-initiative. Our between-subjects user study (N=148) revealed that users' trust propensity and domain knowledge positively influenced their trust in CRSs, and that users with high conscientiousness tended to trust the mixed-initiative system.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 5.
8 papers.
- 2024Towards Human-centered Proactive Conversational Agentscited by 49
- 2025Are Generative AI Agents Effective Personalized Financial Advisors?cited by 18
- 2023XAIR: A Framework of Explainable AI in Augmented Realitycited by 17
- 2025Vibe Check: Understanding the Effects of LLM-Based Conversational Agents' Personality and Alignment on User Perceptions in Goal-Oriented Taskscited by 4
- 2024Navigating User Experience of ChatGPT-based Conversational Recommender Systems: The Effects of Prompt Guidance and Recommendation Domaincited by 3
- 2025Evaluating User Experience in Conversational Recommender Systems: A Systematic Review Across Classical and LLM-Powered Approachescited by 1
- 2025VizTrust: A Visual Analytics Tool for Capturing User Trust Dynamics in Human-AI Communicationcited by 0
- 2025Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 24352 -- Conversational Agents: A Framework for Evaluation (CAFE): Manifestocited by 0
- 2025Vibe Check: Understanding the Effects of LLM-Based Conversational Agents' Personality and Alignment on User Perceptions in Goal-Oriented Tasks11 Sep 2025
- 2025Evaluating User Experience in Conversational Recommender Systems: A Systematic Review Across Classical and LLM-Powered Approaches4 Aug 2025
- 2025Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 24352 -- Conversational Agents: A Framework for Evaluation (CAFE): Manifesto8 Jun 2025
- 2025Are Generative AI Agents Effective Personalized Financial Advisors?8 Apr 2025
- 2025VizTrust: A Visual Analytics Tool for Capturing User Trust Dynamics in Human-AI Communication10 Mar 2025
- 2024Navigating User Experience of ChatGPT-based Conversational Recommender Systems: The Effects of Prompt Guidance and Recommendation Domain22 May 2024
- 2024Towards Human-centered Proactive Conversational Agents19 Apr 2024
- 2023XAIR: A Framework of Explainable AI in Augmented Reality28 Mar 2023