mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Large-Scale ACOPF Solutions and Optimality Bounds

arXiv 2203.11328 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2022math.OCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present the results of a comprehensive benchmarking effort aimed at evaluating and comparing state-of-the-art open-source tools for solving the Alternating-Current Optimal Power Flow (ACOPF) problem. Our numerical experiments include all instances found in the public library PGLIB with network sizes up to 30,000 nodes. The benchmarked tools span a number of programming languages (Python, Julia, Matlab/Octave, and C++), nonlinear optimization solvers (Ipopt, MIPS, and INLP) as well as different mathematical modeling tools (JuMP and Gravity). We also present state-of-the-art optimality bounds obtained using sparsity-exploiting semidefinite programming approaches and corresponding computational times.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.

2 papers.