mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What Do Adversarially trained Neural Networks Focus: A Fourier Domain-based Study

arXiv 2203.08739 ↗First posted 16 Mar 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although many fields have witnessed the superior performance brought about by deep learning, the robustness of neural networks remains an open issue. Specifically, a small adversarial perturbation on the input may cause the model to produce a completely different output. Such poor robustness implies many potential hazards, especially in security-critical applications, e.g., autonomous driving and mobile robotics. This work studies what information the adversarially trained model focuses on. Empirically, we notice that the differences between the clean and adversarial data are mainly distributed in the low-frequency region. We then find that an adversarially-trained model is more robust than its naturally-trained counterpart due to the reason that the former pays more attention to learning the dominant information in low-frequency components. In addition, we consider two common ways to improve model robustness, namely, by data augmentation and by using stronger network architectures, and understand these techniques from a frequency-domain perspective. We are hopeful this work can shed light on the design of more robust neural networks.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2022.

Builds on

29 of 33 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  8. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  9. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  10. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  11. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  12. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
17 more
  1. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  2. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  3. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  4. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  5. 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
  6. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
  7. 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
  8. 2022Anti-Oversmoothing in Deep Vision Transformers via the Fourier Domain Analysis: From Theory to Practicecited by 136
  9. 2019Defensive Quantization: When Efficiency Meets Robustnesscited by 95
  10. 2018Curriculum Adversarial Trainingcited by 89
  11. 2019Metric Learning for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 77
  12. 2020Robust Quantization: One Model to Rule Them Allcited by 63
  13. 2018Seismic Signal Denoising and Decomposition Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 21
  14. 2020Dynamic and Static Context-aware LSTM for Multi-agent Motion Predictioncited by 21
  15. 2021FAT: Learning Low-Bitwidth Parametric Representation via Frequency-Aware Transformationcited by 6
  16. 2021EZCrop: Energy-Zoned Channels for Robust Output Pruningcited by 6
  17. 2019MiniMax Entropy Network: Learning Category-Invariant Features for Domain Adaptationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.

3 papers.