mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Structurally Diverse Sampling for Sample-Efficient Training and Comprehensive Evaluation

arXiv 2203.08445 ↗First posted 16 Mar 2022cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A growing body of research has demonstrated the inability of NLP models to generalize compositionally and has tried to alleviate it through specialized architectures, training schemes, and data augmentation, among other approaches. In this work, we study a different approach: training on instances with diverse structures. We propose a model-agnostic algorithm for subsampling such sets of instances from a labeled instance pool with structured outputs. Evaluating on both compositional template splits and traditional IID splits of 5 semantic parsing datasets of varying complexity, we show that structurally diverse training using our algorithm leads to comparable or better generalization than prior algorithms in 9 out of 10 dataset-split type pairs. In general, we find structural diversity to consistently improve sample efficiency compared to random train sets. Moreover, we show that structurally diverse sampling yields comprehensive test sets that are a lot more challenging than IID test sets. Finally, we provide two explanations for improved generalization from diverse train sets: 1) improved coverage of output substructures, and 2) a reduction in spurious correlations between these substructures.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2022.

Builds on

38 of 53 references.

References · 38

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  3. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  4. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 819
  5. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
  6. 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 496
  7. 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
  8. 2019Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Datacited by 284
  9. 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 263
  10. 2020Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biasescited by 160
  11. 2019Good-Enough Compositional Data Augmentationcited by 158
  12. 2020Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?cited by 147
26 more
  1. 2018Improving Text-to-SQL Evaluation Methodologycited by 135
  2. 2020Task-Oriented Dialogue as Dataflow Synthesiscited by 122
  3. 2021The Devil is in the Detail: Simple Tricks Improve Systematic Generalization of Transformerscited by 117
  4. 2020How Can We Accelerate Progress Towards Human-like Linguistic Generalization?cited by 114
  5. 2019Compositional generalization through meta sequence-to-sequence learningcited by 99
  6. 2020Compositional Generalization via Neural-Symbolic Stack Machinescited by 80
  7. 2020Span-based Semantic Parsing for Compositional Generalizationcited by 77
  8. 2020Sequence-Level Mixed Sample Data Augmentationcited by 71
  9. 2018Practical Obstacles to Deploying Active Learningcited by 68
  10. 2020Zero-Shot Transfer Learning with Synthesized Data for Multi-Domain Dialogue State Trackingcited by 65
  11. 2020Learning to Recombine and Resample Data for Compositional Generalizationcited by 65
  12. 2021Meta-Learning to Compositionally Generalizecited by 62
  13. 2021Mind Your Outliers! Investigating the Negative Impact of Outliers on Active Learning for Visual Question Answeringcited by 62
  14. 2018Rearranging the Familiar: Testing Compositional Generalization in Recurrent Networkscited by 51
  15. 2021Improving Compositional Generalization with Latent Structure and Data Augmentationcited by 46
  16. 2020Improving Compositional Generalization in Semantic Parsingcited by 42
  17. 2021Learning to Synthesize Data for Semantic Parsingcited by 41
  18. 2022Unobserved Local Structures Make Compositional Generalization Hardcited by 29
  19. 2021Finding needles in a haystack: Sampling Structurally-diverse Training Sets from Synthetic Data for Compositional Generalizationcited by 27
  20. 2021COVR: A test-bed for Visually Grounded Compositional Generalization with real imagescited by 25
  21. 2019Don't paraphrase, detect! Rapid and Effective Data Collection for Semantic Parsingcited by 24
  22. 2019Genie: A Generator of Natural Language Semantic Parsers for Virtual Assistant Commandscited by 19
  23. 2020Revisiting Iterative Back-Translation from the Perspective of Compositional Generalizationcited by 19
  24. 2020Latent Compositional Representations Improve Systematic Generalization in Grounded Question Answeringcited by 16
  25. 2021On The Ingredients of an Effective Zero-shot Semantic Parsercited by 13
  26. 2020Schema2QA: High-Quality and Low-Cost Q&A Agents for the Structured Webcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

8 papers.