mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fast Autofocusing using Tiny Transformer Networks for Digital Holographic Microscopy

arXiv 2203.07772 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2022eess.IV cs.CV physics.opticscited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The numerical wavefront backpropagation principle of digital holography confers unique extended focus capabilities, without mechanical displacements along z-axis. However, the determination of the correct focusing distance is a non-trivial and time consuming issue. A deep learning (DL) solution is proposed to cast the autofocusing as a regression problem and tested over both experimental and simulated holograms. Single wavelength digital holograms were recorded by a Digital Holographic Microscope (DHM) with a 10x microscope objective from a patterned target moving in 3D over an axial range of 92 μm. Tiny DL models are proposed and compared such as a tiny Vision Transformer (TViT), tiny VGG16 (TVGG) and a tiny Swin-Transfomer (TSwinT). The proposed tiny networks are compared with their original versions (ViT/B16, VGG16 and Swin-Transformer Tiny) and the main neural networks used in digital holography such as LeNet and AlexNet. The experiments show that the predicted focusing distance ZRPred is accurately inferred with an accuracy of 1.2 μm in average in comparison with the DHM depth of field of 15 μm. Numerical simulations show that all tiny models give the ZRPred with an error below 0.3 μm. Such a prospect would significantly improve the current capabilities of computer vision position sensing in applications such as 3D microscopy for life sciences or micro-robotics. Moreover, all models reach an inference time on CPU, inferior to 25 ms per inference. In terms of occlusions, TViT based on its Transformer architecture is the most robust.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2022.

Builds on

14 of 53 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  6. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  7. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  8. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  9. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
  10. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  11. 2018All-Optical Machine Learning Using Diffractive Deep Neural Networkscited by 177
  12. 2017Phase recovery and holographic image reconstruction using deep learning in neural networkscited by 54
2 more
  1. 2017Lensless computational imaging through deep learningcited by 44
  2. 2021Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) vs Vision Transformer (ViT) for Digital Holographycited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

3 papers.