mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CAROL: Confidence-Aware Resilience Model for Edge Federations

arXiv 2203.07140 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2022cs.DC cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, the deployment of large-scale Internet of Things (IoT) applications has given rise to edge federations that seamlessly interconnect and leverage resources from multiple edge service providers. The requirement of supporting both latency-sensitive and compute-intensive IoT tasks necessitates service resilience, especially for the broker nodes in typical broker-worker deployment designs. Existing fault-tolerance or resilience schemes often lack robustness and generalization capability in non-stationary workload settings. This is typically due to the expensive periodic fine-tuning of models required to adapt them in dynamic scenarios. To address this, we present a confidence aware resilience model, CAROL, that utilizes a memory-efficient generative neural network to predict the Quality of Service (QoS) for a future state and a confidence score for each prediction. Thus, whenever a broker fails, we quickly recover the system by executing a local-search over the broker-worker topology space and optimize future QoS. The confidence score enables us to keep track of the prediction performance and run parsimonious neural network fine-tuning to avoid excessive overheads, further improving the QoS of the system. Experiments on a Raspberry-Pi based edge testbed with IoT benchmark applications show that CAROL outperforms state-of-the-art resilience schemes by reducing the energy consumption, deadline violation rates and resilience overheads by up to 16, 17 and 36 percent, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2022.

Builds on

18 of 58 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  4. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  5. 2020Confidence-Aware Learning for Deep Neural Networkscited by 113
  6. 2020Communication-Computation Trade-Off in Resource-Constrained Edge Inferencecited by 60
  7. 2020Sparse Gaussian Process Variational Autoencoderscited by 21
  8. 2021COSCO: Container Orchestration using Co-Simulation and Gradient Based Optimization for Fog Computing Environmentscited by 19
  9. 2020Dynamic Scheduling for Stochastic Edge-Cloud Computing Environments using A3C learning and Residual Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 14
  10. 2018FogBus: A Blockchain-based Lightweight Framework for Edge and Fog Computingcited by 7
  11. 2019DeFog: Fog Computing Benchmarkscited by 7
  12. 2019Edge AIBench: Towards Comprehensive End-to-end Edge Computing Benchmarkingcited by 6
6 more
  1. 2021Generative Optimization Networks for Memory Efficient Data Generationcited by 5
  2. 2021GOSH: Task Scheduling Using Deep Surrogate Models in Fog Computing Environmentscited by 5
  3. 2020Decentralized Edge-to-Cloud Load-balancing: Service Placement for the Internet of Thingscited by 4
  4. 2018DYVERSE: DYnamic VERtical Scaling in Multi-tenant Edge Environmentscited by 2
  5. 2021Sage: Leveraging ML to Diagnose Unpredictable Performance in Cloud Microservicescited by 2
  6. 2016A comparison of semi-deterministic and stochastic search techniquescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

3 papers.