Adversarial amplitude swap towards robust image classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The vulnerability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to image perturbations such as common corruptions and adversarial perturbations has recently been investigated from the perspective of frequency. In this study, we investigate the effect of the amplitude and phase spectra of adversarial images on the robustness of CNN classifiers. Extensive experiments revealed that the images generated by combining the amplitude spectrum of adversarial images and the phase spectrum of clean images accommodates moderate and general perturbations, and training with these images equips a CNN classifier with more general robustness, performing well under both common corruptions and adversarial perturbations. We also found that two types of overfitting (catastrophic overfitting and robust overfitting) can be circumvented by the aforementioned spectrum recombination. We believe that these results contribute to the understanding and the training of truly robust classifiers.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2022.
Builds on
26 of 37 references.
References · 26
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
14 more
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2020FDA: Fourier Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 540
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
- 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
- 2021A Fourier-based Framework for Domain Generalizationcited by 287
- 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
- 2018Low Frequency Adversarial Perturbationcited by 80
- 2020Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial Trainingcited by 75
- 2021Amplitude-Phase Recombination: Rethinking Robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks in Frequency Domaincited by 70
- 2021Consistency Regularization for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 42
- 2018On the Structural Sensitivity of Deep Convolutional Networks to the Directions of Fourier Basis Functionscited by 31
- 2021Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.
- 2022Game-Theoretic Understanding of Misclassificationcited by 1
- 2022Game-Theoretic Understanding of Misclassification7 Oct 2022