mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Infinite Wordle and the Mastermind numbers

arXiv 2203.06804 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2022math.LO cs.GTcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

I consider the natural infinitary variations of the games Wordle and Mastermind, as well as their game-theoretic variations Absurdle and Madstermind, considering these games with infinitely long words and infinite color sequences and allowing transfinite game play. For each game, a secret codeword is hidden, which the codebreaker attempts to discover by making a series of guesses and receiving feedback as to their accuracy. In Wordle with words of any size from a finite alphabet of n letters, including infinite words or even uncountable words, the codebreaker can nevertheless always win in n steps. Meanwhile, the mastermind number, defined as the smallest winning set of guesses in infinite Mastermind for sequences of length ω over a countable set of colors without duplication, is uncountable, but the exact value turns out to be independent of ZFC, for it is provably equal to the eventually different number frakd(neq^*), which is the same as the covering number of the meager ideal cov(M). I thus place all the various mastermind numbers, defined for the natural variations of the game, into the hierarchy of cardinal characteristics of the continuum.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.