mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Binary Classification Under ℓ0 Attacks for General Noise Distribution

arXiv 2203.04855 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2022cs.LG cs.IT math.ITcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial examples have recently drawn considerable attention in the field of machine learning due to the fact that small perturbations in the data can result in major performance degradation. This phenomenon is usually modeled by a malicious adversary that can apply perturbations to the data in a constrained fashion, such as being bounded in a certain norm. In this paper, we study this problem when the adversary is constrained by the ℓ0 norm; i.e., it can perturb a certain number of coordinates in the input, but has no limit on how much it can perturb those coordinates. Due to the combinatorial nature of this setting, we need to go beyond the standard techniques in robust machine learning to address this problem. We consider a binary classification scenario where d noisy data samples of the true label are provided to us after adversarial perturbations. We introduce a classification method which employs a nonlinear component called truncation, and show in an asymptotic scenario, as long as the adversary is restricted to perturb no more than √d data samples, we can almost achieve the optimal classification error in the absence of the adversary, i.e. we can completely neutralize adversary's effect. Surprisingly, we observe a phase transition in the sense that using a converse argument, we show that if the adversary can perturb more than √d coordinates, no classifier can do better than a random guess.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2022.

Builds on

18 of 24 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  5. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  6. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  7. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  8. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  9. 2018Towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on MNISTcited by 104
  10. 2018SparseFool: a few pixels make a big differencecited by 94
  11. 2019Adversarial camera stickers: A physical camera-based attack on deep learning systemscited by 69
  12. 2020Sparse-RS: a versatile framework for query-efficient sparse black-box adversarial attackscited by 65
6 more
  1. 2019Robustness Certificates for Sparse Adversarial Attacks by Randomized Ablationcited by 59
  2. 2016Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural Networks for Malware Classificationcited by 42
  3. 2019A Simple Explanation for the Existence of Adversarial Examples with Small Hamming Distancecited by 32
  4. 2018Sparsity-based Defense against Adversarial Attacks on Linear Classifierscited by 8
  5. 2021Robust Classification Under ℓ0 Attack for the Gaussian Mixture Modelcited by 5
  6. 2020Sample Complexity of Adversarially Robust Linear Classification on Separated Datacited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.