mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Metric Entropy Duality and the Sample Complexity of Outcome Indistinguishability

arXiv 2203.04536 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2022cs.LG cs.CC cs.DScited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We give the first sample complexity characterizations for outcome indistinguishability, a theoretical framework of machine learning recently introduced by Dwork, Kim, Reingold, Rothblum, and Yona (STOC 2021). In outcome indistinguishability, the goal of the learner is to output a predictor that cannot be distinguished from the target predictor by a class D of distinguishers examining the outcomes generated according to the predictors' predictions. In the distribution-specific and realizable setting where the learner is given the data distribution together with a predictor class P containing the target predictor, we show that the sample complexity of outcome indistinguishability is characterized by the metric entropy of P w.r.t. the dual Minkowski norm defined by D, and equivalently by the metric entropy of D w.r.t. the dual Minkowski norm defined by P. This equivalence makes an intriguing connection to the long-standing metric entropy duality conjecture in convex geometry. Our sample complexity characterization implies a variant of metric entropy duality, which we show is nearly tight. In the distribution-free setting, we focus on the case considered by Dwork et al. where P contains all possible predictors, hence the sample complexity only depends on D. In this setting, we show that the sample complexity of outcome indistinguishability is characterized by the fat-shattering dimension of D. We also show a strong sample complexity separation between realizable and agnostic outcome indistinguishability in both the distribution-free and the distribution-specific settings. This is in contrast to distribution-free (resp. distribution-specific) PAC learning where the sample complexity in both the realizable and the agnostic settings can be characterized by the VC dimension (resp. metric entropy).

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2022.

Builds on

8 of 34 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 221
  2. 2021Calibrating Predictions to Decisions: A Novel Approach to Multi-Class Calibrationcited by 79
  3. 2020Outcome Indistinguishabilitycited by 74
  4. 2021Omnipredictorscited by 71
  5. 2021Multi-group Agnostic PAC Learnabilitycited by 42
  6. 2019Advancing subgroup fairness via sleeping expertscited by 28
  7. 2021Realizable Learning is All You Needcited by 25
  8. 2020Sample Complexity of Uniform Convergence for Multicalibrationcited by 24

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.