Metric Entropy Duality and the Sample Complexity of Outcome Indistinguishability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We give the first sample complexity characterizations for outcome indistinguishability, a theoretical framework of machine learning recently introduced by Dwork, Kim, Reingold, Rothblum, and Yona (STOC 2021). In outcome indistinguishability, the goal of the learner is to output a predictor that cannot be distinguished from the target predictor by a class D of distinguishers examining the outcomes generated according to the predictors' predictions. In the distribution-specific and realizable setting where the learner is given the data distribution together with a predictor class P containing the target predictor, we show that the sample complexity of outcome indistinguishability is characterized by the metric entropy of P w.r.t. the dual Minkowski norm defined by D, and equivalently by the metric entropy of D w.r.t. the dual Minkowski norm defined by P. This equivalence makes an intriguing connection to the long-standing metric entropy duality conjecture in convex geometry. Our sample complexity characterization implies a variant of metric entropy duality, which we show is nearly tight. In the distribution-free setting, we focus on the case considered by Dwork et al. where P contains all possible predictors, hence the sample complexity only depends on D. In this setting, we show that the sample complexity of outcome indistinguishability is characterized by the fat-shattering dimension of D. We also show a strong sample complexity separation between realizable and agnostic outcome indistinguishability in both the distribution-free and the distribution-specific settings. This is in contrast to distribution-free (resp. distribution-specific) PAC learning where the sample complexity in both the realizable and the agnostic settings can be characterized by the VC dimension (resp. metric entropy).
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2022.
Builds on
8 of 34 references.
References · 8
- 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 221
- 2021Calibrating Predictions to Decisions: A Novel Approach to Multi-Class Calibrationcited by 79
- 2020Outcome Indistinguishabilitycited by 74
- 2021Omnipredictorscited by 71
- 2021Multi-group Agnostic PAC Learnabilitycited by 42
- 2019Advancing subgroup fairness via sleeping expertscited by 28
- 2021Realizable Learning is All You Needcited by 25
- 2020Sample Complexity of Uniform Convergence for Multicalibrationcited by 24
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022On-Demand Sampling: Learning Optimally from Multiple Distributionscited by 39
- 2022Omnipredictors for Constrained Optimizationcited by 14
- 2022Comparative Learning: A Sample Complexity Theory for Two Hypothesis Classescited by 8
- 2023An Improved Uniform Convergence Bound with Fat-Shattering Dimensioncited by 3
- 2025How Many Domains Suffice for Domain Generalization? A Tight Characterization via the Domain Shattering Dimensioncited by 3
- 2023Generative Models of Huge Objectscited by 2
- 2026Optimal Deterministic Multicalibration and Omnipredictioncited by 1
- 2026Optimal Deterministic Multicalibration and Omniprediction18 Jun 2026
- 2025How Many Domains Suffice for Domain Generalization? A Tight Characterization via the Domain Shattering Dimension20 Jun 2025
- 2023An Improved Uniform Convergence Bound with Fat-Shattering Dimension13 Jul 2023
- 2023Generative Models of Huge Objects24 Feb 2023
- 2022Comparative Learning: A Sample Complexity Theory for Two Hypothesis Classes16 Nov 2022
- 2022On-Demand Sampling: Learning Optimally from Multiple Distributions22 Oct 2022
- 2022Omnipredictors for Constrained Optimization15 Sep 2022