mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparing lifetime learning methods for morphologically evolving robots

arXiv 2203.03967 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2022cs.RO cs.NEcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evolving morphologies and controllers of robots simultaneously leads to a problem: Even if the parents have well-matching bodies and brains, the stochastic recombination can break this match and cause a body-brain mismatch in their offspring. We argue that this can be mitigated by having newborn robots perform a learning process that optimizes their inherited brain quickly after birth. We compare three different algorithms for doing this. To this end, we consider three algorithmic properties, efficiency, efficacy, and the sensitivity to differences in the morphologies of the robots that run the learning process.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.