mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Table Structure Recognition with Conditional Attention

arXiv 2203.03819 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2022cs.CV cs.IRcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tabular data in digital documents is widely used to express compact and important information for readers. However, it is challenging to parse tables from unstructured digital documents, such as PDFs and images, into machine-readable format because of the complexity of table structures and the missing of meta-information. Table Structure Recognition (TSR) problem aims to recognize the structure of a table and transform the unstructured tables into a structured and machine-readable format so that the tabular data can be further analysed by the down-stream tasks, such as semantic modeling and information retrieval. In this study, we hypothesize that a complicated table structure can be represented by a graph whose vertices and edges represent the cells and association between cells, respectively. Then we define the table structure recognition problem as a cell association classification problem and propose a conditional attention network (CATT-Net). The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method over the state-of-the-art methods on various datasets. Besides, we investigate whether the alignment of a cell bounding box or a text-focused approach has more impact on the model performance. Due to the lack of public dataset annotations based on these two approaches, we further annotate the ICDAR2013 dataset providing both types of bounding boxes, which can be a new benchmark dataset for evaluating the methods in this field. Experimental results show that the alignment of a cell bounding box can help improve the Micro-averaged F1 score from 0.915 to 0.963, and the Macro-average F1 score from 0.787 to 0.923.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2022.

Builds on

18 of 36 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  2. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  4. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
  5. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,255
  6. 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 752
  7. 2021MultiModalQA: Complex Question Answering over Text, Tables and Imagescited by 179
  8. 2020Global Table Extractor (GTE): A Framework for Joint Table Identification and Cell Structure Recognition Using Visual Contextcited by 147
  9. 2020TUTA: Tree-based Transformers for Generally Structured Table Pre-trainingcited by 100
  10. 2020CascadeTabNet: An approach for end to end table detection and structure recognition from image-based documentscited by 98
  11. 2019Complicated Table Structure Recognitioncited by 92
  12. 2020TableNet: Deep Learning model for end-to-end Table detection and Tabular data extraction from Scanned Document Imagescited by 69
6 more
  1. 2020Table Structure Recognition using Top-Down and Bottom-Up Cuescited by 53
  2. 2021LGPMA: Complicated Table Structure Recognition with Local and Global Pyramid Mask Alignmentcited by 46
  3. 2021PP-OCRv2: Bag of Tricks for Ultra Lightweight OCR Systemcited by 39
  4. 2020CDeC-Net: Composite Deformable Cascade Network for Table Detection in Document Imagescited by 22
  5. 2020GFTE: Graph-based Financial Table Extractioncited by 17
  6. 2017TableQA: Question Answering on Tabular Datacited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

6 papers.