Emotion Regulation and Dynamics of Moral Concerns During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The COVID-19 pandemic has upended daily life around the globe, posing a threat to public health. Intuitively, we expect that surging cases and deaths would lead to fear, distress and other negative emotions. However, using state-of-the-art methods to measure sentiment, emotions, and moral concerns in social media messages posted in the early stage of the pandemic, we see a counter-intuitive rise in positive affect. We hypothesize that the increase of positivity is associated with a decrease of uncertainty and emotion regulation. Finally, we identify a partisan divide in moral and emotional reactions that emerged after the first US death. Overall, these results show how collective emotional states have changed since the pandemic began, and how social media can provide a useful tool to understand, and even regulate, diverse patterns underlying human affect.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Leveraging Label Correlations in a Multi-label Setting: A Case Study in Emotioncited by 14
- 2022Using Emotion Embeddings to Transfer Knowledge Between Emotions, Languages, and Annotation Formatscited by 7
- 2026Directed Social Regard: Surfacing Targeted Advocacy, Opposition, Aid, Harms, and Victimization in Online Mediacited by 0
- 2026Directed Social Regard: Surfacing Targeted Advocacy, Opposition, Aid, Harms, and Victimization in Online Media1 May 2026
- 2022Using Emotion Embeddings to Transfer Knowledge Between Emotions, Languages, and Annotation Formats31 Oct 2022
- 2022Leveraging Label Correlations in a Multi-label Setting: A Case Study in Emotion28 Oct 2022