Sharper Bounds for Proximal Gradient Algorithms with Errors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We analyse the convergence of the proximal gradient algorithm for convex composite problems in the presence of gradient and proximal computational inaccuracies. We derive new tighter deterministic and probabilistic bounds that we use to verify a simulated (MPC) and a synthetic (LASSO) optimization problems solved on a reduced-precision machine in combination with an inaccurate proximal operator. We also show how the probabilistic bounds are more robust for algorithm verification and more accurate for application performance guarantees. Under some statistical assumptions, we also prove that some cumulative error terms follow a martingale property. And conforming to observations, e.g., in citeschmidt2011convergence, we also show how the acceleration of the algorithm amplifies the gradient and proximal computational errors.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2022.
Builds on
7 of 51 references.
References · 7
- 2017First Order Methods beyond Convexity and Lipschitz Gradient Continuity with Applications to Quadratic Inverse Problemscited by 37
- 2014Convergence of Stochastic Proximal Gradient Algorithmcited by 17
- 2017Distributed Proximal Gradient Algorithm for Partially Asynchronous Computer Clusterscited by 10
- 2014Maximum Hands-Off Control: A Paradigm of Control Effort Minimizationcited by 6
- 2014On perturbed proximal gradient algorithmscited by 4
- 2017Non-smooth Non-convex Bregman Minimization: Unification and new Algorithmscited by 2
- 2016The Sound of APALM Clapping: Faster Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization with Stochastic Asynchronous PALMcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.