mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust PACm: Training Ensemble Models Under Misspecification and Outliers

arXiv 2203.01859 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2022cs.LG cs.IT math.ITcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Standard Bayesian learning is known to have suboptimal generalization capabilities under misspecification and in the presence of outliers. PAC-Bayes theory demonstrates that the free energy criterion minimized by Bayesian learning is a bound on the generalization error for Gibbs predictors (i.e., for single models drawn at random from the posterior) under the assumption of sampling distributions uncontaminated by outliers. This viewpoint provides a justification for the limitations of Bayesian learning when the model is misspecified, requiring ensembling, and when data is affected by outliers. In recent work, PAC-Bayes bounds -- referred to as PACm -- were derived to introduce free energy metrics that account for the performance of ensemble predictors, obtaining enhanced performance under misspecification. This work presents a novel robust free energy criterion that combines the generalized logarithm score function with PACm ensemble bounds. The proposed free energy training criterion produces predictive distributions that are able to concurrently counteract the detrimental effects of misspecification -- with respect to both likelihood and prior distribution -- and outliers.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2022.

Builds on

23 of 62 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  3. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  4. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
  5. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
  6. 2015Importance Weighted Autoencoderscited by 454
  7. 2015Probabilistic Backpropagation for Scalable Learning of Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 295
  8. 2018Bayesian Model-Agnostic Meta-Learningcited by 194
  9. 2020Efficient and Scalable Bayesian Neural Nets with Rank-1 Factorscited by 171
  10. 2016R'enyi Divergence Variational Inferencecited by 104
  11. 2014Inconsistency of Bayesian Inference for Misspecified Linear Models, and a Proposal for Repairing Itcited by 92
  12. 2016Variational inference for Monte Carlo objectivescited by 83
11 more
  1. 2019Robust Bi-Tempered Logistic Loss Based on Bregman Divergencescited by 61
  2. 2019Generalized Variational Inference: Three arguments for deriving new Posteriorscited by 57
  3. 2019MMD-Bayes: Robust Bayesian Estimation via Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 35
  4. 2017Practical Bayesian optimization in the presence of outlierscited by 25
  5. 2019A Tunable Loss Function for Robust Classification: Calibration, Landscape, and Generalizationcited by 23
  6. 2017Variational Inference based on Robust Divergencescited by 15
  7. 2020PACm-Bayes: Narrowing the Empirical Risk Gap in the Misspecified Bayesian Regimecited by 15
  8. 2021Information-Theoretic Analysis of Epistemic Uncertainty in Bayesian Meta-learningcited by 10
  9. 2019Frequentist Consistency of Generalized Variational Inferencecited by 6
  10. 2020Meta-Learning Divergences of Variational Inferencecited by 3
  11. 2018A more globally accurate dimensionality reduction method using tripletscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.