mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding microbiome dynamics via interpretable graph representation learning

arXiv 2203.01830 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2022q-bio.QM cs.LG math.DScited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale perturbations in the microbiome constitution are strongly correlated, whether as a driver or a consequence, with the health and functioning of human physiology. However, understanding the difference in the microbiome profiles of healthy and ill individuals can be complicated due to the large number of complex interactions among microbes. We propose to model these interactions as a time-evolving graph whose nodes are microbes and edges are interactions among them. Motivated by the need to analyse such complex interactions, we develop a method that learns a low-dimensional representation of the time-evolving graph and maintains the dynamics occurring in the high-dimensional space. Through our experiments, we show that we can extract graph features such as clusters of nodes or edges that have the highest impact on the model to learn the low-dimensional representation. This information can be crucial to identify microbes and interactions among them that are strongly correlated with clinical diseases. We conduct our experiments on both synthetic and real-world microbiome datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2022.

Builds on

28 of 47 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  5. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  6. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
  7. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
  8. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  9. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
  10. 2018Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning with Differentiable Poolingcited by 786
  11. 2014Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documentscited by 677
  12. 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 653
16 more
  1. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
  2. 2017Convolutional Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 550
  3. 2019EvolveGCN: Evolving Graph Convolutional Networks for Dynamic Graphscited by 443
  4. 2019Self-Attention Graph Poolingcited by 421
  5. 2020Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Losscited by 397
  6. 2019Representation Learning for Dynamic Graphs: A Surveycited by 260
  7. 2017graph2vec: Learning Distributed Representations of Graphscited by 228
  8. 2017A Survey on Network Embeddingcited by 142
  9. 2017Network Representation Learning: A Surveycited by 101
  10. 2018DynGEM: Deep Embedding Method for Dynamic Graphscited by 100
  11. 2018dyngraph2vec: Capturing Network Dynamics using Dynamic Graph Representation Learningcited by 88
  12. 2019Hierarchical Graph Pooling with Structure Learningcited by 81
  13. 2019Attention Interpretability Across NLP Taskscited by 71
  14. 2021A Survey on Embedding Dynamic Graphscited by 60
  15. 2021Effective Attention Sheds Light On Interpretabilitycited by 11
  16. 2020GraphKKE: Graph Kernel Koopman Embedding for Human Microbiome Analysiscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.