Convolutional neural networks as an alternative to Bayesian retrievals
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Exoplanet observations are currently analysed with Bayesian retrieval techniques. Due to the computational load of the models used, a compromise is needed between model complexity and computing time. Analysis of data from future facilities, will need more complex models which will increase the computational load of retrievals, prompting the search for a faster approach for interpreting exoplanet observations. Our goal is to compare machine learning retrievals of exoplanet transmission spectra with nested sampling, and understand if machine learning can be as reliable as Bayesian retrievals for a statistically significant sample of spectra while being orders of magnitude faster. We generate grids of synthetic transmission spectra and their corresponding planetary and atmospheric parameters, one using free chemistry models, and the other using equilibrium chemistry models. Each grid is subsequently rebinned to simulate both HST/WFC3 and JWST/NIRSpec observations, yielding four datasets in total. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are trained with each of the datasets. We perform retrievals on a 1,000 simulated observations for each combination of model type and instrument with nested sampling and machine learning. We also use both methods to perform retrievals on real WFC3 transmission spectra. Finally, we test how robust machine learning and nested sampling are against incorrect assumptions in our models. CNNs reach a lower coefficient of determination between predicted and true values of the parameters. Nested sampling underestimates the uncertainty in ~8% of retrievals, whereas CNNs estimate them correctly. For real WFC3 observations, nested sampling and machine learning agree within 2σ for ~86% of spectra. When doing retrievals with incorrect assumptions, nested sampling underestimates the uncertainty in ~12% to ~41% of cases, whereas this is always below ~10% for the CNN.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2022.
Builds on
0 of 7 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Searching for Novel Chemistry in Exoplanetary Atmospheres using Machine Learning for Anomaly Detectioncited by 3
- 2024Flow Matching for Atmospheric Retrieval of Exoplanets: Where Reliability meets Adaptive Noise Levelscited by 3
- 2023Intercomparison of Brown Dwarf Model Grids and Atmospheric Retrieval Using Machine Learningcited by 2
- 2023Reconstructing Atmospheric Parameters of Exoplanets Using Deep Learningcited by 0
- 2026Hunting for "Oddballs" with Machine Learning: Detecting Anomalous Exoplanets Using a Deep-Learned Low-Dimensional Representation of Transit Spectra with Autoencoderscited by 0
- 2026Hunting for "Oddballs" with Machine Learning: Detecting Anomalous Exoplanets Using a Deep-Learned Low-Dimensional Representation of Transit Spectra with Autoencoders5 Jan 2026
- 2024Flow Matching for Atmospheric Retrieval of Exoplanets: Where Reliability meets Adaptive Noise Levels28 Oct 2024
- 2023Reconstructing Atmospheric Parameters of Exoplanets Using Deep Learning2 Oct 2023
- 2023Searching for Novel Chemistry in Exoplanetary Atmospheres using Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection15 Aug 2023
- 2023Intercomparison of Brown Dwarf Model Grids and Atmospheric Retrieval Using Machine Learning12 May 2023