mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Addressing Gap between Training Data and Deployed Environment by On-Device Learning

arXiv 2203.01077 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The accuracy of tinyML applications is often affected by various environmental factors, such as noises, location/calibration of sensors, and time-related changes. This article introduces a neural network based on-device learning (ODL) approach to address this issue by retraining in deployed environments. Our approach relies on semi-supervised sequential training of multiple neural networks tailored for low-end edge devices. This article introduces its algorithm and implementation on wireless sensor nodes consisting of a Raspberry Pi Pico and low-power wireless module. Experiments using vibration patterns of rotating machines demonstrate that retraining by ODL improves anomaly detection accuracy compared with a prediction-only deep neural network in a noisy environment. The results also show that the ODL approach can save communication cost and energy consumption for battery-powered Internet of Things devices.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2022.

Builds on

3 of 10 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020Learning under Concept Drift: A Reviewcited by 470
  2. 2019Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence with Edge Computingcited by 225
  3. 2019A Neural Network-Based On-device Learning Anomaly Detector for Edge Devicescited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

6 papers.