mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On genetic programming representations and fitness functions for interpretable dimensionality reduction

arXiv 2203.00528 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2022cs.NE cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dimensionality reduction (DR) is an important technique for data exploration and knowledge discovery. However, most of the main DR methods are either linear (e.g., PCA), do not provide an explicit mapping between the original data and its lower-dimensional representation (e.g., MDS, t-SNE, isomap), or produce mappings that cannot be easily interpreted (e.g., kernel PCA, neural-based autoencoder). Recently, genetic programming (GP) has been used to evolve interpretable DR mappings in the form of symbolic expressions. There exists a number of ways in which GP can be used to this end and no study exists that performs a comparison. In this paper, we fill this gap by comparing existing GP methods as well as devising new ones. We evaluate our methods on several benchmark datasets based on predictive accuracy and on how well the original features can be reconstructed using the lower-dimensional representation only. Finally, we qualitatively assess the resulting expressions and their complexity. We find that various GP methods can be competitive with state-of-the-art DR algorithms and that they have the potential to produce interpretable DR mappings.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2022.

Builds on

13 of 40 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
  2. 2020Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biasescited by 344
  3. 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 215
  4. 2020Understanding How Dimension Reduction Tools Work: An Empirical Approach to Deciphering t-SNE, UMAP, TriMAP, and PaCMAP for Data Visualizationcited by 173
  5. 2018Revisiting Small Batch Training for Deep Neural Networkscited by 102
  6. 2014A Weighted Correlation Index for Rankings with Tiescited by 41
  7. 2020Learning a Formula of Interpretability to Learn Interpretable Formulascited by 14
  8. 2019On Explaining Machine Learning Models by Evolving Crucial and Compact Featurescited by 9
  9. 2020Genetic Programming for Evolving a Front of Interpretable Models for Data Visualisationcited by 9
  10. 2016Differentiable Genetic Programmingcited by 7
  11. 2019Can Genetic Programming Do Manifold Learning Too?cited by 5
  12. 2020Multi-Objective Genetic Programming for Manifold Learning: Balancing Quality and Dimensionalitycited by 5
1 more
  1. 2019Genetic Programming for Evolving Similarity Functions for Clustering: Representations and Analysiscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.