Addressing Randomness in Evaluation Protocols for Out-of-Distribution Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Neural Networks for classification behave unpredictably when confronted with inputs not stemming from the training distribution. This motivates out-of-distribution detection (OOD) mechanisms. The usual lack of prior information on out-of-distribution data renders the performance estimation of detection approaches on unseen data difficult. Several contemporary evaluation protocols are based on open set simulations, which average the performance over up to five synthetic random splits of a dataset into in- and out-of-distribution samples. However, the number of possible splits may be much larger, and the performance of Deep Neural Networks is known to fluctuate significantly depending on different sources of random variation. We empirically demonstrate that current protocols may fail to provide reliable estimates of the expected performance of OOD methods. By casting this evaluation as a random process, we generalize the concept of open set simulations and propose to estimate the performance of OOD methods using a Monte Carlo approach that addresses the randomness.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2022.
Builds on
16 of 35 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 942
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 754
- 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 538
- 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 425
- 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 321
- 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 310
4 more
- 2017Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Studycited by 267
- 2019C2AE: Class Conditioned Auto-Encoder for Open-set Recognitioncited by 142
- 2020Hybrid Models for Open Set Recognitioncited by 109
- 2018Learning a Neural-network-based Representation for Open Set Recognitioncited by 40
Built on by
Not cited yet.