Popularity Bias in Collaborative Filtering-Based Multimedia Recommender Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multimedia recommender systems suggest media items, e.g., songs, (digital) books and movies, to users by utilizing concepts of traditional recommender systems such as collaborative filtering. In this paper, we investigate a potential issue of such collaborative-filtering based multimedia recommender systems, namely popularity bias that leads to the underrepresentation of unpopular items in the recommendation lists. Therefore, we study four multimedia datasets, i.e., LastFm, MovieLens, BookCrossing and MyAnimeList, that we each split into three user groups differing in their inclination to popularity, i.e., LowPop, MedPop and HighPop. Using these user groups, we evaluate four collaborative filtering-based algorithms with respect to popularity bias on the item and the user level. Our findings are three-fold: firstly, we show that users with little interest into popular items tend to have large user profiles and thus, are important data sources for multimedia recommender systems. Secondly, we find that popular items are recommended more frequently than unpopular ones. Thirdly, we find that users with little interest into popular items receive significantly worse recommendations than users with medium or high interest into popularity.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2022.
Builds on
9 of 25 references.
References · 9
- 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
- 2019Managing Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems with Personalized Re-rankingcited by 81
- 2019The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 68
- 2021User-centered Evaluation of Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemscited by 38
- 2019The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Music Recommendation: A Reproducibility Studycited by 24
- 2019Global and country-specific mainstreaminess measures: Definitions, analysis, and usage for improving personalized music recommendation systemscited by 4
- 2014Recommending Items in Social Tagging Systems Using Tag and Time Informationcited by 3
- 2021Support the Underground: Characteristics of Beyond-Mainstream Music Listenerscited by 3
- 2015Attention Please! A Hybrid Resource Recommender Mimicking Attention-Interpretation Dynamicscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
8 papers.
- 2023A Survey on Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemscited by 42
- 2024Reproducibility in Machine Learning-based Research: Overview, Barriers and Driverscited by 34
- 2024Establishing and Evaluating Trustworthy AI: Overview and Research Challengescited by 12
- 2023Metrics for popularity bias in dynamic recommender systemscited by 3
- 2023A Comparative Analysis of Bias Amplification in Graph Neural Network Approaches for Recommender Systemscited by 0
- 2023A Study on Accuracy, Miscalibration, and Popularity Bias in Recommendationscited by 0
- 2025Private Selection with Heterogeneous Sensitivitiescited by 0
- 2025Modeling Bias Evolution in Fashion Recommender Systems: A System Dynamics Approachcited by 0
- 2025Modeling Bias Evolution in Fashion Recommender Systems: A System Dynamics Approach27 Sep 2025
- 2025Private Selection with Heterogeneous Sensitivities9 Jan 2025
- 2024Establishing and Evaluating Trustworthy AI: Overview and Research Challenges15 Nov 2024
- 2024Reproducibility in Machine Learning-based Research: Overview, Barriers and Drivers20 Jun 2024
- 2023Metrics for popularity bias in dynamic recommender systems12 Oct 2023
- 2023A Survey on Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems2 Aug 2023
- 2023A Study on Accuracy, Miscalibration, and Popularity Bias in Recommendations1 Mar 2023
- 2023A Comparative Analysis of Bias Amplification in Graph Neural Network Approaches for Recommender Systems18 Jan 2023