ReCasNet: Improving consistency within the two-stage mitosis detection framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mitotic count (MC) is an important histological parameter for cancer diagnosis and grading, but the manual process for obtaining MC from whole-slide histopathological images is very time-consuming and prone to error. Therefore, deep learning models have been proposed to facilitate this process. Existing approaches utilize a two-stage pipeline: the detection stage for identifying the locations of potential mitotic cells and the classification stage for refining prediction confidences. However, this pipeline formulation can lead to inconsistencies in the classification stage due to the poor prediction quality of the detection stage and the mismatches in training data distributions between the two stages. In this study, we propose a Refine Cascade Network (ReCasNet), an enhanced deep learning pipeline that mitigates the aforementioned problems with three improvements. First, window relocation was used to reduce the number of poor quality false positives generated during the detection stage. Second, object re-cropping was performed with another deep learning model to adjust poorly centered objects. Third, improved data selection strategies were introduced during the classification stage to reduce the mismatches in training data distributions. ReCasNet was evaluated on two large-scale mitotic figure recognition datasets, canine cutaneous mast cell tumor (CCMCT) and canine mammary carcinoma (CMC), which resulted in up to 4.8% percentage point improvements in the F1 scores for mitotic cell detection and 44.1% reductions in mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for MC prediction. Techniques that underlie ReCasNet can be generalized to other two-stage object detection networks and should contribute to improving the performances of deep learning models in broad digital pathology applications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2022.
Builds on
12 of 41 references.
References · 12
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
- 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
- 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 749
- 2019Deep neural network models for computational histopathology: A surveycited by 165
- 2017Exploring the Landscape of Spatial Robustnesscited by 81
- 2018Predicting breast tumor proliferation from whole-slide images: the TUPAC16 challengecited by 61
- 2014Assessment of algorithms for mitosis detection in breast cancer histopathology imagescited by 16
- 2021OncoPetNet: A Deep Learning based AI system for mitotic figure counting on H&E stained whole slide digital images in a large veterinary diagnostic lab settingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.