On the Benefits of Large Learning Rates for Kernel Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper studies an intriguing phenomenon related to the good generalization performance of estimators obtained by using large learning rates within gradient descent algorithms. First observed in the deep learning literature, we show that a phenomenon can be precisely characterized in the context of kernel methods, even though the resulting optimization problem is convex. Specifically, we consider the minimization of a quadratic objective in a separable Hilbert space, and show that with early stopping, the choice of learning rate influences the spectral decomposition of the obtained solution on the Hessian's eigenvectors. This extends an intuition described by Nakkiran (2020) on a two-dimensional toy problem to realistic learning scenarios such as kernel ridge regression. While large learning rates may be proven beneficial as soon as there is a mismatch between the train and test objectives, we further explain why it already occurs in classification tasks without assuming any particular mismatch between train and test data distributions.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2022.
Builds on
14 of 30 references.
References · 14
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 675
- 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 427
- 2021On the Origin of Implicit Regularization in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 184
- 2019Towards Explaining the Regularization Effect of Initial Large Learning Rate in Training Neural Networkscited by 162
- 2020The Break-Even Point on Optimization Trajectories of Deep Neural Networkscited by 150
- 2018A Walk with SGDcited by 78
- 2018Statistical Optimality of Stochastic Gradient Descent on Hard Learning Problems through Multiple Passescited by 69
- 2016Optimal Rates For Regularization Of Statistical Inverse Learning Problemscited by 68
- 2021Stochastic Training is Not Necessary for Generalizationcited by 63
- 2020Catastrophic Fisher Explosion: Early Phase Fisher Matrix Impacts Generalizationcited by 62
- 2016End-to-End Kernel Learning with Supervised Convolutional Kernel Networkscited by 28
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 3.
8 papers.
- 2022SGD with Large Step Sizes Learns Sparse Featurescited by 68
- 2022The Dynamics of Sharpness-Aware Minimization: Bouncing Across Ravines and Drifting Towards Wide Minimacited by 51
- 2022Learning threshold neurons via the "edge of stability"cited by 51
- 2023(S)GD over Diagonal Linear Networks: Implicit Regularisation, Large Stepsizes and Edge of Stabilitycited by 36
- 2022Spectral Evolution and Invariance in Linear-width Neural Networkscited by 30
- 2024Learning Associative Memories with Gradient Descentcited by 16
- 2024Towards Understanding Inductive Bias in Transformers: A View From Infinitycited by 13
- 2024Understanding the Generalization Benefits of Late Learning Rate Decaycited by 6
- 2024Learning Associative Memories with Gradient Descent28 Feb 2024
- 2024Towards Understanding Inductive Bias in Transformers: A View From Infinity7 Feb 2024
- 2024Understanding the Generalization Benefits of Late Learning Rate Decay21 Jan 2024
- 2023(S)GD over Diagonal Linear Networks: Implicit Regularisation, Large Stepsizes and Edge of Stability17 Feb 2023
- 2022Learning threshold neurons via the "edge of stability"14 Dec 2022
- 2022Spectral Evolution and Invariance in Linear-width Neural Networks11 Nov 2022
- 2022SGD with Large Step Sizes Learns Sparse Features11 Oct 2022
- 2022The Dynamics of Sharpness-Aware Minimization: Bouncing Across Ravines and Drifting Towards Wide Minima4 Oct 2022