mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

KMIR: A Benchmark for Evaluating Knowledge Memorization, Identification and Reasoning Abilities of Language Models

arXiv 2202.13529 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2022cs.CLcited by 6

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Previous works show the great potential of pre-trained language models (PLMs) for storing a large amount of factual knowledge. However, to figure out whether PLMs can be reliable knowledge sources and used as alternative knowledge bases (KBs), we need to further explore some critical features of PLMs. Firstly, knowledge memorization and identification abilities: traditional KBs can store various types of entities and relationships; do PLMs have a high knowledge capacity to store different types of knowledge? Secondly, reasoning ability: a qualified knowledge source should not only provide a collection of facts, but support a symbolic reasoner. Can PLMs derive new knowledge based on the correlations between facts? To evaluate these features of PLMs, we propose a benchmark, named Knowledge Memorization, Identification, and Reasoning test (KMIR). KMIR covers 3 types of knowledge, including general knowledge, domain-specific knowledge, and commonsense, and provides 184,348 well-designed questions. Preliminary experiments with various representative pre-training language models on KMIR reveal many interesting phenomenons: 1) The memorization ability of PLMs depends more on the number of parameters than training schemes. 2) Current PLMs are struggling to robustly remember the facts. 3) Model compression technology retains the amount of knowledge well, but hurts the identification and reasoning abilities. We hope KMIR can facilitate the design of PLMs as better knowledge sources.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 32 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2022.

Builds on

32 of 53 references.

References · 32

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  6. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  7. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  8. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  9. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  10. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  11. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  12. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
20 more
  1. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  2. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  3. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  4. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  5. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
  6. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  7. 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,065
  8. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
  9. 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 713
  10. 2020KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Taskscited by 571
  11. 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 567
  12. 2018Wizard of Wikipedia: Knowledge-Powered Conversational agentscited by 530
  13. 2017Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehensioncited by 425
  14. 2020Retrieve, Program, Repeat: Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Alternate Meta-learningcited by 216
  15. 2020The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligencecited by 194
  16. 2020JAKET: Joint Pre-training of Knowledge Graph and Language Understandingcited by 73
  17. 2015Reasoning about Entailment with Neural Attentioncited by 68
  18. 2019Cognitive Graph for Multi-Hop Reading Comprehension at Scalecited by 65
  19. 2019Recent Advances in Natural Language Inference: A Survey of Benchmarks, Resources, and Approachescited by 64
  20. 2021Logic-Driven Context Extension and Data Augmentation for Logical Reasoning of Textcited by 46

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022A Survey of Knowledge Enhanced Pre-trained Language Models
  2. 2024Can Language Models Act as Knowledge Bases at Scale?
  3. 2023Knowledge-Augmented Reasoning Distillation for Small Language Models in Knowledge-Intensive Tasks
  4. 2022The KITMUS Test: Evaluating Knowledge Integration from Multiple Sources in Natural Language Understanding Systems
  5. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories
  6. 2024On Memorization of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoning
  7. 2024How Reliable are LLMs as Knowledge Bases? Re-thinking Facutality and Consistency
  8. 2023Knowledge Rumination for Pre-trained Language Models