The Impact of Explanations on Layperson Trust in Artificial Intelligence-Driven Symptom Checker Apps: Experimental Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To achieve the promoted benefits of an AI symptom checker, laypeople must trust and subsequently follow its instructions. In AI, explanations are seen as a tool to communicate the rationale behind black-box decisions to encourage trust and adoption. However, the effectiveness of the types of explanations used in AI-driven symptom checkers has not yet been studied. Social theories suggest that why-explanations are better at communicating knowledge and cultivating trust among laypeople. This study ascertains whether explanations provided by a symptom checker affect explanatory trust among laypeople (N=750) and whether this trust is impacted by their existing knowledge of disease. Results suggest system builders developing explanations for symptom-checking apps should consider the recipient's knowledge of a disease and tailor explanations to each user's specific need. Effort should be placed on generating explanations that are personalized to each user of a symptom checker to fully discount the diseases that they may be aware of and to close their information gap.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.