mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BeDivFuzz: Integrating Behavioral Diversity into Generator-based Fuzzing

arXiv 2202.13114 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2022cs.SEcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A popular metric to evaluate the performance of fuzzers is branch coverage. However, we argue that focusing solely on covering many different branches (i.e., the richness) is not sufficient since the majority of the covered branches may have been exercised only once, which does not inspire a high confidence in the reliability of the covered code. Instead, the distribution of the executed branches (i.e., the evenness) should also be considered. That is, behavioral diversity is only given if the generated inputs not only trigger many different branches, but also trigger them evenly often with diverse inputs. We introduce BeDivFuzz, a feedback-driven fuzzing technique for generator-based fuzzers. BeDivFuzz distinguishes between structure-preserving and structure-changing mutations in the space of syntactically valid inputs, and biases its mutation strategy towards validity and behavioral diversity based on the received program feedback. We have evaluated BeDivFuzz on Ant, Maven, Rhino, Closure, Nashorn, and Tomcat. The results show that BeDivFuzz achieves better behavioral diversity than the state of the art, measured by established biodiversity metrics, namely the Hill numbers, from the field of ecology.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.