mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Inference of Affordances and Active Motor Control in Simulated Agents

arXiv 2202.11532 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2022cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Flexible, goal-directed behavior is a fundamental aspect of human life. Based on the free energy minimization principle, the theory of active inference formalizes the generation of such behavior from a computational neuroscience perspective. Based on the theory, we introduce an output-probabilistic, temporally predictive, modular artificial neural network architecture, which processes sensorimotor information, infers behavior-relevant aspects of its world, and invokes highly flexible, goal-directed behavior. We show that our architecture, which is trained end-to-end to minimize an approximation of free energy, develops latent states that can be interpreted as affordance maps. That is, the emerging latent states signal which actions lead to which effects dependent on the local context. In combination with active inference, we show that flexible, goal-directed behavior can be invoked, incorporating the emerging affordance maps. As a result, our simulated agent flexibly steers through continuous spaces, avoids collisions with obstacles, and prefers pathways that lead to the goal with high certainty. Additionally, we show that the learned agent is highly suitable for zero-shot generalization across environments: After training the agent in a handful of fixed environments with obstacles and other terrains affecting its behavior, it performs similarly well in procedurally generated environments containing different amounts of obstacles and terrains of various sizes at different locations.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2022.

Builds on

16 of 47 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
  4. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  5. 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,598
  6. 2018World Modelscited by 1,444
  7. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,221
  8. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
  9. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 748
  10. 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
  11. 2018Quantifying Generalization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 345
  12. 2019Exploring Model-based Planning with Policy Networkscited by 90
4 more
  1. 2020Sample-efficient Cross-Entropy Method for Real-time Planningcited by 90
  2. 2021Sparsely Changing Latent States for Prediction and Planning in Partially Observable Domainscited by 18
  3. 2020Learning to Move with Affordance Mapscited by 15
  4. 2018Learning, Planning, and Control in a Monolithic Neural Event Inference Architecturecited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.