mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

UX Research on Conversational Human-AI Interaction: A Literature Review of the ACM Digital Library

arXiv 2202.09895 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2022cs.HC cs.CYcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Early conversational agents (CAs) focused on dyadic human-AI interaction between humans and the CAs, followed by the increasing popularity of polyadic human-AI interaction, in which CAs are designed to mediate human-human interactions. CAs for polyadic interactions are unique because they encompass hybrid social interactions, i.e., human-CA, human-to-human, and human-to-group behaviors. However, research on polyadic CAs is scattered across different fields, making it challenging to identify, compare, and accumulate existing knowledge. To promote the future design of CA systems, we conducted a literature review of ACM publications and identified a set of works that conducted UX (user experience) research. We qualitatively synthesized the effects of polyadic CAs into four aspects of human-human interactions, i.e., communication, engagement, connection, and relationship maintenance. Through a mixed-method analysis of the selected polyadic and dyadic CA studies, we developed a suite of evaluation measurements on the effects. Our findings show that designing with social boundaries, such as privacy, disclosure, and identification, is crucial for ethical polyadic CAs. Future research should also advance usability testing methods and trust-building guidelines for conversational AI.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Trust No Bot: Discovering Personal Disclosures in Human-LLM Conversations in the Wildcited by 43
  2. 2025TRUTH DECAY: Quantifying Multi-Turn Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 31
  3. 2024Language Models in Dialogue: Conversational Maxims for Human-AI Interactionscited by 21
  4. 2024PeerGPT: Probing the Roles of LLM-based Peer Agents as Team Moderators and Participants in Children's Collaborative Learningcited by 18
  5. 2023Conversational AI-Powered Design: ChatGPT as Designer, User, and Productcited by 8
  6. 2023Comparing How a Chatbot References User Utterances from Previous Chatting Sessions: An Investigation of Users' Privacy Concerns and Perceptionscited by 8
  7. 2024A Survey on Human-AI Collaboration with Large Foundation Modelscited by 7
  8. 2025Multi-Party Conversational Agents: A Surveycited by 6
  9. 2025When Should Users Check? Modeling Confirmation Frequency in Multi-Step Agentic AI Taskscited by 6
  10. 2023Synergizing Human-AI Agency: A Guide of 23 Heuristics for Service Co-Creation with LLM-Based Agentscited by 5
  11. 2025Psychological and behavioural responses in human-agent vs. human-human interactions: a systematic review and meta-analysiscited by 2
  12. 2025Conversational Agents for Older Adults' Health: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 1
8 more
  1. 2025Botender: Supporting Communities in Collaboratively Designing AI Agents through Case-Based Provocationscited by 1
  2. 2022Reinforced MOOCs Concept Recommendation in Heterogeneous Information Networkscited by 0
  3. 2022Explanation-Guided Fairness Testing through Genetic Algorithmcited by 0
  4. 2022Using Graph Neural Networks for Program Terminationcited by 0
  5. 2023Tribe or Not? Critical Inspection of Group Differences Using TribalGramcited by 0
  6. 2025Designing and Evaluating a Conversational Agent for Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementiascited by 0
  7. 2026From Overload to Convergence: Supporting Multi-Issue Human-AI Negotiation with Bayesian Visualizationcited by 0
  8. 2026The Challenges of Balancing AI Compliance and Technological Innovations in Critical Sectors: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 0