mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Grammar-Based Grounded Lexicon Learning

arXiv 2202.08806 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2022cs.CL cs.AI cs.CVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present Grammar-Based Grounded Lexicon Learning (G2L2), a lexicalist approach toward learning a compositional and grounded meaning representation of language from grounded data, such as paired images and texts. At the core of G2L2 is a collection of lexicon entries, which map each word to a tuple of a syntactic type and a neuro-symbolic semantic program. For example, the word shiny has a syntactic type of adjective; its neuro-symbolic semantic program has the symbolic form λx. filter(x, SHINY), where the concept SHINY is associated with a neural network embedding, which will be used to classify shiny objects. Given an input sentence, G2L2 first looks up the lexicon entries associated with each token. It then derives the meaning of the sentence as an executable neuro-symbolic program by composing lexical meanings based on syntax. The recovered meaning programs can be executed on grounded inputs. To facilitate learning in an exponentially-growing compositional space, we introduce a joint parsing and expected execution algorithm, which does local marginalization over derivations to reduce the training time. We evaluate G2L2 on two domains: visual reasoning and language-driven navigation. Results show that G2L2 can generalize from small amounts of data to novel compositions of words.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2022.

Builds on

31 of 56 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  4. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  5. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  6. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
  7. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  8. 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 376
  9. 2019The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervisioncited by 372
  10. 2015Improved Semantic Representations From Tree-Structured Long Short-Term Memory Networkscited by 306
  11. 2018Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understandingcited by 304
  12. 2016Modular Multitask Reinforcement Learning with Policy Sketchescited by 203
19 more
  1. 2014Unifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language Modelscited by 198
  2. 2018Compositional Attention Networks for Machine Reasoningcited by 183
  3. 2020DreamCoder: Growing generalizable, interpretable knowledge with wake-sleep Bayesian program learningcited by 161
  4. 2019Good-Enough Compositional Data Augmentationcited by 158
  5. 2017Learning to Reason: End-to-End Module Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 125
  6. 2016Learning to Compose Neural Networks for Question Answeringcited by 85
  7. 2019Compound Probabilistic Context-Free Grammars for Grammar Inductioncited by 76
  8. 2018SwitchOut: an Efficient Data Augmentation Algorithm for Neural Machine Translationcited by 72
  9. 2020Sequence-Level Mixed Sample Data Augmentationcited by 71
  10. 2020Learning to Recombine and Resample Data for Compositional Generalizationcited by 65
  11. 2019Unsupervised Latent Tree Induction with Deep Inside-Outside Recursive Autoencoderscited by 60
  12. 2019Linguistic generalization and compositionality in modern artificial neural networkscited by 58
  13. 2018Transparency by Design: Closing the Gap Between Performance and Interpretability in Visual Reasoningcited by 51
  14. 2019Visually Grounded Neural Syntax Acquisitioncited by 48
  15. 2020Visually Grounded Compound PCFGscited by 34
  16. 2020A Competence-aware Curriculum for Visual Concepts Learning via Question Answeringcited by 16
  17. 2018Latent Tree Learning with Differentiable Parsers: Shift-Reduce Parsing and Chart Parsingcited by 7
  18. 2021Learning Syntax from Naturally-Occurring Bracketingscited by 4
  19. 2018Word learning and the acquisition of syntactic--semantic overhypothesescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 6; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Neural-Symbolic Recursive Machine for Systematic Generalization
  2. 2024Reframing linguistic bootstrapping as joint inference using visually-grounded grammar induction models
  3. 2026Gyan: An Explainable Neuro-Symbolic Language Model
  4. 2023Describe me an Aucklet: Generating Grounded Perceptual Category Descriptions
  5. 2024Semantic Graphs for Syntactic Simplification: A Revisit from the Age of LLM
  6. 2026Deep networks learn to parse uniform-depth context-free languages from local statistics
  7. 2021Language Modelling via Learning to Rank
  8. 2024Position Paper: Generalized grammar rules and structure-based generalization beyond classical equivariance for lexical tasks and transduction