Visual Ground Truth Construction as Faceted Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work in Machine Learning and Computer Vision has provided evidence of systematic design flaws in the development of major object recognition benchmark datasets. One such example is ImageNet, wherein, for several categories of images, there are incongruences between the objects they represent and the labels used to annotate them. The consequences of this problem are major, in particular considering the large number of machine learning applications, not least those based on Deep Neural Networks, that have been trained on these datasets. In this paper we posit the problem to be the lack of a knowledge representation (KR) methodology providing the foundations for the construction of these ground truth benchmark datasets. Accordingly, we propose a solution articulated in three main steps: (i) deconstructing the object recognition process in four ordered stages grounded in the philosophical theory of teleosemantics; (ii) based on such stratification, proposing a novel four-phased methodology for organizing objects in classification hierarchies according to their visual properties; and (iii) performing such classification according to the faceted classification paradigm. The key novelty of our approach lies in the fact that we construct the classification hierarchies from visual properties exploiting visual genus-differentiae, and not from linguistically grounded properties. The proposed approach is validated by a set of experiments on the ImageNet hierarchy of musical experiments.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2022.
Builds on
22 of 67 references.
References · 22
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,722
- 2016NTU RGB+D: A Large Scale Dataset for 3D Human Activity Analysiscited by 683
- 2017Residual Attention Network for Image Classificationcited by 385
10 more
- 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 340
- 2016YouTube-8M: A Large-Scale Video Classification Benchmarkcited by 324
- 2015YFCC100M: The New Data in Multimedia Researchcited by 234
- 2014Towards Open World Recognitioncited by 226
- 2019Does Object Recognition Work for Everyone?cited by 149
- 2021Reduced, Reused and Recycled: The Life of a Dataset in Machine Learning Researchcited by 100
- 2020From ImageNet to Image Classification: Contextualizing Progress on Benchmarkscited by 90
- 2017What Does Explainable AI Really Mean? A New Conceptualization of Perspectivescited by 72
- 2019Continual egocentric object recognitioncited by 12
- 2021Towards Visual Semanticscited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Aligning Visual and Lexical Semanticscited by 7
- 2022A Diversity-Aware Domain Development Methodologycited by 4
- 2022Building a visual semantics aware object hierarchycited by 3
- 2023Incremental Image Labeling via Iterative Refinementcited by 3
- 2023Incremental Image Labeling via Iterative Refinement18 Apr 2023
- 2022Aligning Visual and Lexical Semantics13 Dec 2022
- 2022A Diversity-Aware Domain Development Methodology27 Aug 2022
- 2022Building a visual semantics aware object hierarchy26 Feb 2022