mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DermX: an end-to-end framework for explainable automated dermatological diagnosis

arXiv 2202.06956 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2022eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dermatological diagnosis automation is essential in addressing the high prevalence of skin diseases and critical shortage of dermatologists. Despite approaching expert-level diagnosis performance, convolutional neural network (ConvNet) adoption in clinical practice is impeded by their limited explainability, and by subjective, expensive explainability validations. We introduce DermX and DermX+, an end-to-end framework for explainable automated dermatological diagnosis. DermX is a clinically-inspired explainable dermatological diagnosis ConvNet, trained using DermXDB, a 554 image dataset annotated by eight dermatologists with diagnoses, supporting explanations, and explanation attention maps. DermX+ extends DermX with guided attention training for explanation attention maps. Both methods achieve near-expert diagnosis performance, with DermX, DermX+, and dermatologist F1 scores of 0.79, 0.79, and 0.87, respectively. We assess the explanation performance in terms of identification and localization by comparing model-selected with dermatologist-selected explanations, and gradient-weighted class-activation maps with dermatologist explanation maps, respectively. DermX obtained an identification F1 score of 0.77, while DermX+ obtained 0.79. The localization F1 score is 0.39 for DermX and 0.35 for DermX+. These results show that explainability does not necessarily come at the expense of predictive power, as our high-performance models provide expert-inspired explanations for their diagnoses without lowering their diagnosis performance.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2022.

Builds on

16 of 47 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  6. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  7. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  8. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  9. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  10. 2019EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detectioncited by 1,018
  11. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  12. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
4 more
  1. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
  2. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
  3. 2018Tell Me Where to Look: Guided Attention Inference Networkcited by 168
  4. 2020Explainable deep learning models in medical image analysiscited by 111

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

8 papers.